On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:07:50 -0400
Wyatt Epp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:14, Ciaran McCreesh
> wrote:
> > First: how do tags relate to categories? Are they independent, a
> > refinement or a replacement?
>
> I would suggest they be a replacement because categories are just an
> overly lim
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:29:51 +0400
Peter Volkov wrote:
> > src_prepare() {
> > echo "./logos/gentoo.logo" >> logo_config
> > echo "./logos/gentoo2.logo" >> logo_config
> > echo "./logos/banner-simplified.logo" >> logo_config
> > echo "./logos/banner.logo" >> logo_config
> > ec
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:07:50 -0400
Wyatt Epp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:14, Ciaran McCreesh
> wrote:
> > First: how do tags relate to categories? Are they independent, a
> > refinement or a replacement?
> >
> I would suggest they be a replacement because categories are just an
> overly
В Птн, 24/06/2011 в 06:20 +, Jeroen Roovers (jer) пишет:
> jer 11/06/24 06:20:28
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:linux-logo-5.11.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump.
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/app-misc/linux-logo/linux-logo
Another question I think that needs be asked, is "What does a tag look
like", or "What sort of values can a 'tag' have?".
People are probably assuming it will be some arbitrary name like
"video" or "sound" or soforth, but there is potential to use tags for
more than that.
Consider ideas such as t
On 06/22/2011 11:15 PM, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
> Symlinks are clean, and portage has
> always been file-oriented so I see no problem with using them for
> this. All we need is to deference the symlink to find the real name of
> the package and put it in world instead of the symlinked name
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:14, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> First: how do tags relate to categories? Are they independent, a
> refinement or a replacement?
>
I would suggest they be a replacement because categories are just an
overly limited subset of a proper tagging scheme.
> Second: which of the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/22/2011 05:18 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 22 June 2011 08:37, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Right. mplayer, xine, etc, work just fine as for instance mp3
>>> players. So media- is fine for them.
>>
>> But probably we'll move it into media-play
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:08:35 +0200
Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
> But it's also true that besides the symlinks, the portage tree will
> be broken the same moment you put it into a fat volume, because it
> will directly erase all the permissions and ownership metadata.
Those don't matter to a
2011/6/23 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>:
> Jesús J. Guerrero Botella posted on Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:15:44 +0200 as
> excerpted:
>
>> Symlinks are clean, and portage has always been file-oriented so I see
>> no problem with using them for this.
>
> It has been some years since I've seen the argument
Jesús J. Guerrero Botella posted on Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:15:44 +0200 as
excerpted:
> Symlinks are clean, and portage has always been file-oriented so I see
> no problem with using them for this.
It has been some years since I've seen the argument made, but if I'm not
mistaken, at least back in 20
Le mardi 21 juin 2011 à 16:05 +0200, Ulrich Mueller a écrit :
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
> >> --- Comment #2 from Gilles Dartiguelongue 2011-06-21
> >> 09:35:59 UTC ---
> >> Afaik, the bash-completion eclass adds the use flag only to make
> >> sure the user has ba
12 matches
Mail list logo
