On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:25:57 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Umm... I believe Ciaran meant "no description" in the practical PM
> implementation rules sense, not in the general definition sense,
> which I suppose most folks here understand by now.
No, it's worse than that. Cons
2011/6/23 Kent Fredric :
> On 23 June 2011 09:46, Zac Medico wrote:
>
> In order for this metadata to be of any use to a user, it would need
> to have some way to facilitate its use, whether it be a fake generated
> directory of symlinks, or a dedicated program ( like debians aptitude
> ) for expl
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 21:25, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Umm... I believe Ciaran meant "no description" in the practical PM
> implementation rules sense, not in the general definition sense, which I
> suppose most folks here understand by now.
>
Most is not all. ;) In general, I try n
Wyatt Epp posted on Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:57:47 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 14:19, Ciaran McCreesh
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:55:18 +1200 Kent Fredric
>> wrote:
>>> I'd love a tag solution, that'd be nice, is there a GLEP for it yet?
>> The slow parts are coming up with
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 14:19, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:55:18 +1200
> Kent Fredric wrote:
>> I'd love a tag solution, that'd be nice, is there a GLEP for it yet?
>> And if so, how long will it take to get this "tag" feature supported
>> by EAPI standards?
>
> The slow parts
On 06/22/2011 04:58 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 23 June 2011 09:46, Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> It could be implemented with a metadata.xml extension, or possibly an
>> new ebuild variable. A GLEP would be a good way to propose such an
>> extension.
>
> I'd myself see metadata.xml or ebuild variable
On 23 June 2011 09:46, Zac Medico wrote:
> It could be implemented with a metadata.xml extension, or possibly an
> new ebuild variable. A GLEP would be a good way to propose such an
> extension.
I'd myself see metadata.xml or ebuild variables, on their own, less
than useful.
For me, the primary
On 06/22/2011 02:38 AM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> Whatever happened to implementing tags for the Portage tree? The idea
> behind tags was to avoid spamming users with more and more
> directories, especially for apps that are hard to categorize. Which,
> arguably, is most of them. We have tags for web
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:16:25 justin wrote:
> On 6/22/11 4:47 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 22 Juni 2011, 16:35:07 schrieb Matthew Summers:
> >> One thing to note is that a few various python modules, like numpy,
> >> really benefit from fortran. While many people using numpy
> "j" == justin writes:
j> 1. leave [the fortran USE flag] as it is as global USE enabled.
This is the best option for the vast majority of users.
There are just too many important and useful apps which (rely on
libraries which)* include fortran code.
The few cases where it is not a benef
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:55:18 +1200
Kent Fredric wrote:
> I'd love a tag solution, that'd be nice, is there a GLEP for it yet?
> And if so, how long will it take to get this "tag" feature supported
> by EAPI standards?
The slow parts are coming up with a good design, getting the Council to
approve
On 16:27 Tue 14 Jun , Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:08:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > And no, I don't think that Gentoo should fully support reduced-@system
> > builds, but there is no harm in making them more of a viable option.
>
> Personally... I think gentoo should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/06/2011 07:42 μμ, Dane Smith wrote:
> On 06/22/11 12:41, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 22/06/2011 07:30 ¼¼, Dane Smith wrote:
>>> On 06/22/11 12:18, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 22/06/2011 06:47 ¼¼, Christoph Mende wrote:
> On Mi, 2011-06-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/11 12:41, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 22/06/2011 07:30 ¼¼, Dane Smith wrote:
>> On 06/22/11 12:18, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 22/06/2011 06:47 ¼¼, Christoph Mende wrote:
On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/06/2011 07:30 μμ, Dane Smith wrote:
> On 06/22/11 12:18, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 22/06/2011 06:47 ¼¼, Christoph Mende wrote:
>>> On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/11 12:18, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 22/06/2011 06:47 ¼¼, Christoph Mende wrote:
>> On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>
>>> On 22/06/2011 06:19 ??, Dane Smith wr
On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 19:18 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 22/06/2011 06:47 μμ, Christoph Mende wrote:
> > On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA512
> >>
> >> On 22/06/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/06/2011 06:47 μμ, Christoph Mende wrote:
> On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 22/06/2011 06:19 ??, Dane Smith wrote:
>>> - gpg control packet
>>> All,
>>> [..]
On Mi, 2011-06-22 at 18:33 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 22/06/2011 06:19 ??, Dane Smith wrote:
> > - gpg control packet
> > All,
> > [..]
> > Thanks!
> >
> > [1] http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/03/c1phers-adopt-a-package-program/
>
> Create a formal Gentoo project with its own herd and alias. Whenever a
> packages has a proxy-maintainer, instead of having 2 maintainer entries
> (one for the user, one for the dev), have the users contact information,
> and put the package in the herd associated with the project. (Say
> proxy-m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/06/2011 06:19 ??, Dane Smith wrote:
> - gpg control packet
> All,
> [..]
> Thanks!
>
> [1] http://dev.c1pher.net/index.php/2011/03/c1phers-adopt-a-package-program/
>
Hi Dane,
I tried to do the same a year ago. Have a look here. It may help y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
As some of you may have seen, over the past couple months I've been
serving as a proxy-maintainer on a number of packages for a fair few
proxy-committeers through what I've been calling C1phers Adopt a Package
Program [1]. So far, I would consider
On 6/22/11 4:47 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 22 Juni 2011, 16:35:07 schrieb Matthew Summers:
>>
>> Hey Justin,
>>
>> One thing to note is that a few various python modules, like numpy,
>> really benefit from fortran. While many people using numpy are
>> scientists, many are not and f
Am Mittwoch 22 Juni 2011, 16:35:07 schrieb Matthew Summers:
>
> Hey Justin,
>
> One thing to note is that a few various python modules, like numpy,
> really benefit from fortran. While many people using numpy are
> scientists, many are not and further there are various modules that
> depend on nu
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:01 AM, justin wrote:
> On 22/06/11 09:55, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:15:35 +0200
>> justin wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/06/11 16:18, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:17 AM, justin wrote:
> HI,
>
> with the addition of the fortran-2
Sorry I'm a one time Gentoo developer, and a first timer on the Gentoo
mailing list and no longer a Gentoo user. My question has been
answered, thanks!
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Dane Smith wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/21/11 07:46, Matt Joiner wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-06-2011 08:02, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:48:44 +
> "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote:
>
>
>> Is there any particular reason to create this project as a top-level
>> project? I don't see why this shouldn't be a base sub-
On 22 June 2011 21:38, Joshua Saddler wrote:
>
> Whatever happened to implementing tags for the Portage tree? The idea
> behind tags was to avoid spamming users with more and more
> directories, especially for apps that are hard to categorize. Which,
Agreed. From the perspective of what will need
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:24:07 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As we discussed for a while, the media-sound/ category has grown
> very large and it may be a good idea to split it.
>
> Right now, it contains audio players, editing software, converters,
> sound systems and a lot of other uti
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:18:26 +1200
Kent Fredric wrote:
> incidentally, I'd be in favour of splitting mplayer and mencoder into
> seperate dists if it were sanely plausible to do so.
A same thing would be great, say, for ffmpeg. Right now we just have
USE=encode which enable all encoder dependenc
On 22 June 2011 08:37, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Right. mplayer, xine, etc, work just fine as for instance mp3
>> players. So media- is fine for them.
>
> But probably we'll move it into media-players and so on then.
mplayer and some other things most-often used for playback might be a
bit of a
audio-* sound better.
graphics-* sounds better, if I suggested gfx it was just it's how we
have it now in media-gfx (I never liked that either).
I also think that media-* can stay. So, something like this would be
closer, I guess.
graphics-viewers
graphics-editors
graphics-plugins
graphics-libs
a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:48:44 +
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote:
> Is there any particular reason to create this project as a top-level
> project? I don't see why this shouldn't be a base sub-project, like
> openrc.
By the way, base/index.x
On 22/06/11 09:55, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:15:35 +0200
> justin wrote:
>
>> On 21/06/11 16:18, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:17 AM, justin wrote:
HI,
with the addition of the fortran-2.eclass, it is possible to
remove the USE=fortran fr
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:40 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:14, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:48:44 + "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
> > wrote:
> >> On 21-06-2011 09:43, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> > I'd like to announce that I've created an initial proje
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:15:35 +0200
justin wrote:
> On 21/06/11 16:18, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:17 AM, justin wrote:
> >> HI,
> >>
> >> with the addition of the fortran-2.eclass, it is possible to
> >> remove the USE=fortran from the default profiles. Any objections?
> >>
On 21/06/11 16:18, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:17 AM, justin wrote:
>> HI,
>>
>> with the addition of the fortran-2.eclass, it is possible to remove the
>> USE=fortran from the default profiles. Any objections?
>>
>> justin
>
> Nope, I actually suggested this back in December,
37 matches
Mail list logo
