Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that explicitly DEPEND on sys-apps/sed

2011-06-13 Thread Zac Medico
On 06/13/2011 08:58 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Judging from [1], a couple of thousands of ebuilds DEPEND on > sys-apps/sed, which is a system package (in profiles/base/packages) > since at least 2004. It boils down to some 2535 ebuilds, 1409 packages > and 14 eclasses, some requiring a version as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that explicitly DEPEND on sys-apps/sed

2011-06-13 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 06:14:06AM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:58:56 +0200 > Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > > Judging from [1], a couple of thousands of ebuilds DEPEND on > > sys-apps/sed, which is a system package (in profiles/base/packages) > > since at least 2004. It boils

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that explicitly DEPEND on sys-apps/sed

2011-06-13 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:58:56 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Judging from [1], a couple of thousands of ebuilds DEPEND on > sys-apps/sed, which is a system package (in profiles/base/packages) > since at least 2004. It boils down to some 2535 ebuilds, 1409 packages > and 14 eclasses, some requiring

[gentoo-dev] Packages that explicitly DEPEND on sys-apps/sed

2011-06-13 Thread Jeroen Roovers
Judging from [1], a couple of thousands of ebuilds DEPEND on sys-apps/sed, which is a system package (in profiles/base/packages) since at least 2004. It boils down to some 2535 ebuilds, 1409 packages and 14 eclasses, some requiring a version as high as 4.0.5, which went stable in 2003. What do you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa: index.xml

2011-06-13 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11-06-2011 20:48, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday, June 11, 2011 16:24:00 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:58:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: So, effectively the QA team lead can appoint the people who elect him. I'm not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2011-06-13 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > 7) media-gfx/simple-scan I'm taking this since it's likely to be integrated with GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 Thanks, -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reviving webapp-config

2011-06-13 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Monday 13 of June 2011 11:35:08 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 06/13/11 01:44, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > On Friday 10 of June 2011 20:08:00 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:37:46 -0500 > >> > >> Matthew Summers wrote: > >>> After consultation and discussion at length with several

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2011-06-13 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 13/06/2011 05:09 ??, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> 2) dev-vcs/qsvn >> 3) kde-misc/kcometen4 >> 4) kde-misc/kgrubeditor >> 5) kde-misc/plasmatvgr >> 6) kde-misc/kanyremote >> 8) media-gfx/sm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2011-06-13 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > 2) dev-vcs/qsvn > 3) kde-misc/kcometen4 > 4) kde-misc/kgrubeditor > 5) kde-misc/plasmatvgr > 6) kde-misc/kanyremote > 8) media-gfx/smile > 9) media-gfx/pictureflow > 10) media-sound/qpitch > 11) media-sound/qtagger > 12) media-video/avidem

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass

2011-06-13 Thread justin
On 6/13/11 11:19 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 6/13/11 11:06 AM, justin wrote: >> # @FUNCTION: fortran-2_pkg_setup >> # @DESCRIPTION: >> # Setup functionallity, checks for a valid fortran compiler and optionally >> for its openmp support. >> fortran-2_pkg_setup() { >> _have-valid-fortra

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reviving webapp-config

2011-06-13 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 06/13/11 01:44, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Friday 10 of June 2011 20:08:00 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:37:46 -0500 >> >> Matthew Summers wrote: >>> After consultation and discussion at length with several developers, I >>> am writing to announce the impending revival of th

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2011-06-13 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I have no interest in the following packages anymore. Most of them are low maintenance and/or supposed to be co-maintained by other herds 1) dev-util/ticpp 2) dev-vcs/qsvn 3) kde-misc/kcometen4 4) kde-misc/kgrubeditor 5) kde-misc/plasmatvgr 6) kde-m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass

2011-06-13 Thread justin
On 6/13/11 11:19 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 6/13/11 11:06 AM, justin wrote: >> # @FUNCTION: fortran-2_pkg_setup >> # @DESCRIPTION: >> # Setup functionallity, checks for a valid fortran compiler and optionally >> for its openmp support. >> fortran-2_pkg_setup() { >> _have-valid-fortra

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass

2011-06-13 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 6/13/11 11:06 AM, justin wrote: > # @FUNCTION: fortran-2_pkg_setup > # @DESCRIPTION: > # Setup functionallity, checks for a valid fortran compiler and optionally > for its openmp support. > fortran-2_pkg_setup() { > _have-valid-fortran || \ > die "Please emerge the current g

[gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass

2011-06-13 Thread justin
Hi all, please review and comment the attached eclass. Purpose of this eclass is the correct setting of a working fortran compiler. There are numerous bugs which suffer from one or the other defect here. Anybody who touch a fortran package knows what I am talking about. Currently we support two f