On Saturday, June 11, 2011 16:24:00 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:58:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > So, effectively the QA team lead can appoint the people who elect
> > > him. I'm not at all implying that Diego would abuse his position,
> > > but still I think that this is
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:58:43 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > So, effectively the QA team lead can appoint the people who elect
> > him. I'm not at all implying that Diego would abuse his position,
> > but still I think that this is not a sane situation.
>
> it does seem trivial to remove people w
On 11-06-2011 21:18:09 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> So, effectively the QA team lead can appoint the people who elect him.
> I'm not at all implying that Diego would abuse his position, but still
> I think that this is not a sane situation.
This issue was already raised on the "Glep 48 update (a
historically, glibc provided all the ugly rpc support (while not nearly as
relevant today, it still is used by way of nfs support). the glibc
maintainers have opted to stop supporting this. at first they declined to
accept new features, but now they've started removing support for new code to
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 15:18:09 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote:
> > please re-read GLEP48 as I updated it at the end of the council
> > meeting to reflect the changes already approved on March (txt
> > version, I still need to update the html).
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote:
> please re-read GLEP48 as I updated it at the end of the council
> meeting to reflect the changes already approved on March (txt
> version, I still need to update the html).
> The GLEP states that the team lead shall be elected annually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-06-2011 16:58, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:13:14 +0200
> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>
>> Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 17.33 +0200, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Reading all this, I kept wondering how you think your self
On Friday, June 10, 2011 22:36:20 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> - two has been kicked out for playing along just if they can also make
> the rules (as soon as a rule was enacted that they didn't like they
> decided to ignore it, even under request to either not do so or be
> removed from QA);
if i'
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:13:14 +0200
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 17.33 +0200, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto:
> >
> > Reading all this, I kept wondering how you think your self-appointed
> > position as "team lead" (look how I'm stretching the definition
> > there) is sti
# Sergei Trofimovich (11 Jun 2011)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. 'Abandoned' by upstream.
# Fails to build on modern toolchain:
##284216, #367191, #267974
#
# Upstream now provides splitted packages for various gtk
# subsystems:
# dev-haskell/pango
# dev-haskell/cairo
# dev-hask
Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 17.33 +0200, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto:
>
> Reading all this, I kept wondering how you think your self-appointed
> position as "team lead" (look how I'm stretching the definition there)
> is still tenable. Good luck there.
I'd suggest you to know facts before sland
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:36:20 +0200
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Which is exactly what I'm going to do: I'm going to make sure that the
> team is on the same page: policies has to be followed, or they need to
> be changed. Which doesn't look like either of them (nor you I guess)
> want to do. I'm p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-06-2011 09:23, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 06/11/2011 03:36 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 01.48 +0100, Markos Chandras ha scritto:
>> Maybe I scream in private, but what you three (keeping Tomáa out of
>> this)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/11/2011 03:36 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 01.48 +0100, Markos Chandras ha scritto:
>>
>> I am sorry but this is not a way for a leader to treat the members of
>> his team. I am retiring myself from QA as well.
Am Freitag, 10. Juni 2011, 20:14:24 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
>
> Perhaps interested people on the team could just say they want to be
> lead, and the council would pick one of them. I think leadership should
> come from the top.
Luckily the council is elected... otherwise this would kind of remind
On 10.06.2011 18:33, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
> * Samuli, extremist right wing parties are gaining power in your
> country, I think this is a way better reason to rebel than a stupid file.
True Finns are not right wing. The foreign media seems to always get it
wrong. They
On 10.06.2011 14:44, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 03:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> do we need some kind of policy around membership on "special"
>> project teams. QA and Devrel are the most obvious examples, Infra might
>> be another.
>
> in my eyes we do. too much power to be unregul
17 matches
Mail list logo
