On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 20:16 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Even if it fulfills the restrictions for global variables, it is still
> an abuse of the spec, because PMS defines S as follows:
> "The full path to the temporary build directory, used by src_compile,
> src_install etc."
I don't see how s
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 19:41:20 Dale wrote:
I have a question or two. I don't care if you, or others, reply to this
with a answer, just think on it. A policy, rule if you will, has been
decided on by the council. This after MUCH discussion on this list and
the cou
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:45:03 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:36:59 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the
> > > > current situation.
> > >
> > > of course it
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 22:02:23 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 30, 2011 12:20:15 Leho Kraav wrote:
> >> /etc/profile.d/dbus-session.sh attached, looking for feedback about
> >> problems with it and if the whole approach eve
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 19:41:20 Dale wrote:
> I have a question or two. I don't care if you, or others, reply to this
> with a answer, just think on it. A policy, rule if you will, has been
> decided on by the council. This after MUCH discussion on this list and
> the council hearing both sid
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> isnt there a gentoo-release mailing list for catalyst and such ?
>
I presume this is so that users can extract stages using pbzip2 in
parallel? Since pbzip2 can only parallel-extract bzip2 archives made
with pbzip2?
What's wrong with using
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday, April 30, 2011 12:20:15 Leho Kraav wrote:
>> /etc/profile.d/dbus-session.sh attached, looking for feedback about
>> problems with it and if the whole approach even makes sense. I might be
>> not knowing something important.
>
> i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I nominate William Hubbs (williamh)
- --
David Abbott (dabbott)
Gentoo
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk3ux2
Mike Frysinger wrote:
seems we gauge things differently as i dont think it's that black& white,
although it probably is further in your white than in my black. further, i
dont believe people actually get useful information out of this, they just
think they do (perception vs reality). when an
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 18:08:17 Matt Turner wrote:
> There _was_ a policy before, but it was unclear about documenting
> version removals and arguably didn't require it, so after a few
> developers (you've been often mentioned as one of them) refused to
> document version removals in the changel
On Saturday, April 30, 2011 12:20:15 Leho Kraav wrote:
> This is something like net-misc/keychain is for key management. My main
> use case so far is to do with gnome-keyring-daemon for Subversion. If
> you want to have a password-locked keyring, you will have to unlock it
> every time you have a n
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:32:03 Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote:
>> >> To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fi
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:32:03 Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote:
> >> To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fiasco
> >> was this exact attitude. I don't like the current
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:36:59 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the current
> > > situation.
> >
> > of course it does. it makes the current situation irrelevant.
>
> Does this mean
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the current
>> > situation.
>>
>> of course it does. it makes the current situation irrelevant.
>
> Does this mean we s
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the current
> > situation.
>
> of course it does. it makes the current situation irrelevant.
Does this mean we should shortly be expecting to see you do the work to
migrate the t
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:23:23 Dane Smith wrote:
> On 06/07/11 17:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote:
> >> To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fiasco
> >> was this exact attitude. I don't like the current policy either,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote:
>> To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fiasco
>> was this exact attitude. I don't like the current policy either, it's
>> far too wide. However, if you go back
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 10:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:41:08 Mark Loeser wrote:
>>> "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" said:
vapier 11/05/16 03:30:02
Removed: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild
Log:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/07/11 17:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote:
>> To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fiasco
>> was this exact attitude. I don't like the current policy either, it's
>> far t
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:14:05 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > On 06/07/11 15:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > waste of time. i simply wont bother removing old versions until
> > > changelogs start being autogenerated or the policy is sane again.
>
> For the record, I support Dane's statement 10
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 05:13:38 Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Simple pros I see mentioned:
additional pro: automatic culling of information no longer relevant. entries
dating back to 2002 rarely are useful today. we could easily implement a cap
via date, size, files still in the tree, # of entri
On 06/07/2011 10:53 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:41:08 Mark Loeser wrote:
>> "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" said:
>>> vapier 11/05/16 03:30:02
>>>
>>> Removed: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild
>>> Log:
>>> old
>>
>> Please document removal of ebuilds in ChangeLogs
> On 06/07/11 15:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
(...)
> > waste of time. i simply wont bother removing old versions until
> > changelogs start being autogenerated or the policy is sane again.
For the record, I support Dane's statement 100%.
In addition, I would like to say that you're behaving pret
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote:
> To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fiasco
> was this exact attitude. I don't like the current policy either, it's
> far too wide. However, if you go back and look at why it even *got* to
> council, it was because y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/07/11 15:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:41:08 Mark Loeser wrote:
>> "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" said:
>>> vapier 11/05/16 03:30:02
>>>
>>> Removed: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild
>>> Log:
>>> old
>>
>> Please
isnt there a gentoo-release mailing list for catalyst and such ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 15:53:01 Matt Turner wrote:
> No user has a need for more than some small subset of the total
> available locales.
the rub is in which locales the user cares about
> I filed bug [1] to request the ability to select locales in catalyst
> spec files, but no responses after
On Sunday, May 15, 2011 14:24:16 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> I volunteered to help Diego summarize a news item on "crossdev, glib and
> binary compatibility"
i really dont think crossdev merits a news item considering its general
support status and the likely hood of actual users who are affected
On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:41:08 Mark Loeser wrote:
> "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" said:
> > vapier 11/05/16 03:30:02
> >
> > Removed: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild
> > Log:
> > old
>
> Please document removal of ebuilds in ChangeLogs.
waste of time. i simply wont bother removing
Hi,
Building 400~ locales is not fun on mips when building stages.
No user has a need for more than some small subset of the total
available locales.
I filed bug [1] to request the ability to select locales in catalyst
spec files, but no responses after six months -- which is totally
typical of
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> But it is not compliant with PMS:
>> "If S is assigned in the global scope of an ebuild, then the
>> restrictions of section 12.2 for global variables apply." (section 12.1)
>> "Global variables must only contain invariant values." (section 12.2)
On 13:21 Mon 30 May , Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 May 2011, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > Il giorno lun, 30/05/2011 alle 08.27 +0200, Michał Górny ha scritto:
> >> S="${WORKDIR}/solutious-${PN}-*"
> >>
> >> I'm surprised if that actually works. I'd say that seems not
> >> PMS-comp
Hi folks,
Sebastian told me about the problem of not being able to render the
logo in recent blender versions. So this is were I stepped in: I tried
it and used the geometries from the old .blender file, and the
yellowish reflecting image.
Problem was to recreate the exact representation of the o
On 6/3/11 9:18 AM, dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:40:26AM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> ...
>> We can't have a tarball, most of the files from the package are
>> non-redistributable.
>> ...
>
> Then why do ebuilds contain line LICENSE="GPL-2"?
Good catch. Well, the
35 matches
Mail list logo
