On 5/10/11 4:08 AM, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> - Does this tree signing key have to be DSA? Or is RSA okay too?
No idea, I'd probably just try and see if signing works.
> - If I have a key already, should I generate a new subkey just
> for manifest signing, make a whole new primary key, or just use
>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 02:30:20PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> for people who dont have a key yet:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=6
I'm pretty new to advanced gpg usage and management, and so had a
couple questions not answered by that page:
- Does thi
Out of tree kernel module and upstream does not closely
track kernel release (current 2.8.2 only supports up to
2.6.32). There are alternatives already accepted in
the kernel such as Ceph or OCFS2. (#337374)
Removal on 2011-07-09
--
Justin Bronder
pgpfzIcU7dwXi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jory A. Pratt posted on Mon, 09 May 2011 18:23:02 -0500 as excerpted:
> Thanks to all those who contribute to ensure the Mozilla experience is
> as painful as possible on Gentoo and look forwarding to have new minds
> join the herd.
Painful? Is that an in joke non-gentoo-dev readers aren't likel
On 05/09/2011 06:23 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> As many of you are aware, the Mozilla team is extremely thin. We are
> currently looking for a few new developers and even current developers
> to assist the herd with -bin packages. As my time is spent with source
> builds of XULRunner,Thunderbird,Fir
On Monday, May 09, 2011 07:00:09 PM Matt Turner wrote:
> 2011/5/9 Alexis Ballier :
> > maybe your answer is in the readme :)
> > http://www.splitted-desktop.com/~gbeauchesne/libva/patches/000_README
> >
> > some of them are needed, some of them are useful, some we could certainly
> > drop. If the
As many of you are aware, the Mozilla team is extremely thin. We are
currently looking for a few new developers and even current developers
to assist the herd with -bin packages. As my time is spent with source
builds of XULRunner,Thunderbird,Firefox,icecat,seamonkey, and
spidermonkey I do not have
2011/5/9 Alexis Ballier :
> maybe your answer is in the readme :)
> http://www.splitted-desktop.com/~gbeauchesne/libva/patches/000_README
>
> some of them are needed, some of them are useful, some we could certainly
> drop. If the most important patches could go upstream then, again, I'm all for
>
On Monday, May 09, 2011 12:25:18 PM Matt Turner wrote:
> 2011/4/29 Matt Turner :
> > 2011/3/9 Alexis Ballier :
> >> As for the reasons: "its the fdo version + a debian/patches dir with,
> >> heh, some fixes and improvements I'm using..."
> >
> > So, the SDS version is simply the freedesktop versio
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> should have announced this before, but nvidia-settings needs an active
> maintainer or it should be merged back to the nvidia-drivers
>
> the bugs idle on maintainer-needed@ now, you can find them easily by
> search keyword of "nvidia-setti
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> should have announced this before, but nvidia-settings needs an active
> maintainer or it should be merged back to the nvidia-drivers
>
> the bugs idle on maintainer-needed@ now, you can find them easily by
> search keyword of "nvidia-settin
should have announced this before, but nvidia-settings needs an active
maintainer or it should be merged back to the nvidia-drivers
the bugs idle on maintainer-needed@ now, you can find them easily by
search keyword of "nvidia-settings"
Jer has been doing some work on the matter, so might want to
2011/4/29 Matt Turner :
> 2011/3/9 Alexis Ballier :
>> As for the reasons: "its the fdo version + a debian/patches dir with, heh,
>> some fixes and improvements I'm using..."
>
> So, the SDS version is simply the freedesktop version with a few
> patches on top? So, the freedesktop version is actual
13 matches
Mail list logo
