[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: openrc use flag

2011-04-20 Thread Duncan
Michał Górny posted on Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:33:27 +0200 as excerpted: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:22:53 -0500 William Hubbs > wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:02:41PM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: >> > В Срд, 20/04/2011 в 12:24 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: >> > > The author of the bug feels that t

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc use flag

2011-04-20 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:31:46AM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:02:41 +0400 > Peter Volkov wrote: > > > В Срд, 20/04/2011 в 12:24 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: > > > The author of the bug feels that the way to fix this is for us to > > > put a check in openrc that makes it

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item

2011-04-20 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:23:19 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > I have converted all my systems to baselayout-2/openrc now, and on all > of them, the very /last/ message shown after the emerge run is that > "[x] important configuration files [in /etc]" need to be updated. > > I would think that Gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc use flag

2011-04-20 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:02:41 +0400 Peter Volkov wrote: > В Срд, 20/04/2011 в 12:24 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: > > The author of the bug feels that the way to fix this is for us to > > put a check in openrc that makes it refuse to run services if it > > was not used in the boot process. Why refu

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item

2011-04-20 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:12:21 -0500 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > From a glance over the guide, it wasn't immediately obvious what in > there would result in a broken system. Perhaps it's the "run > dispatch-conf" that's buried in the middle of a paragraph without > enough emphasis? That's particular

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item

2011-04-20 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 13:32 Thu 14 Apr , Kfir Lavi wrote: > When i run world update, I usually don't really check all the written > stuff. > > If I do this, I'm sure a lot more Gentoo users do the same. So do > expect people rebooting the machine without checking what your have > wrote. This can be a major he

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc use flag

2011-04-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 20-04-2011 13:22:53 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:02:41PM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > > В Срд, 20/04/2011 в 12:24 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: > > > The author of the bug feels that the way to fix this is for us to put a > > > check in openrc that makes it refuse to ru

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc use flag

2011-04-20 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:22:53 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:02:41PM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > > В Срд, 20/04/2011 в 12:24 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: > > > The author of the bug feels that the way to fix this is for us to > > > put a check in openrc that makes it refus

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc use flag

2011-04-20 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:02:41PM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Срд, 20/04/2011 в 12:24 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: > > The author of the bug feels that the way to fix this is for us to put a > > check in openrc that makes it refuse to run services if it was not used > > in the boot process. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc use flag

2011-04-20 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 20-04-2011 a las 22:02 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió: > В Срд, 20/04/2011 в 12:24 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: > > The author of the bug feels that the way to fix this is for us to put a > > check in openrc that makes it refuse to run services if it was not used > > in the boot process. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc use flag

2011-04-20 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 20/04/2011 в 12:24 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: > The author of the bug feels that the way to fix this is for us to put a > check in openrc that makes it refuse to run services if it was not used > in the boot process. This is good idea to have in any case since I remember my system went cra

[gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc use flag

2011-04-20 Thread William Hubbs
All, This bug [1] brings up an issue that I would like thoughts about. sys-fs/udev and net-wireless/bluez, among other packages, install udev rules which assume that you are using openrc. On systems where openrc is not used in the boot process, this causes issues because openrc services are run

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan)

2011-04-20 Thread Corentin Chary
2011/4/19 Tomáš Chvátal : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dne 16.4.2011 08:29, Corentin Chary napsal(a): >> New website is up and running at >> >> http://euscan.iksaif.net/ >> >> The git tree is still at http://git.iksaif.net/?p=euscan.git;a=summary >> >> TODO: >> - Make some

Re: [gentoo-dev] New mysql eclasses review

2011-04-20 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote: >>> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: XTRADB_VER >>> # @DESCRIPTION: >>> # Version of the XTRADB storage engine >>> XTRADB_VER="${XTRADB_VER}" >> >> Is this assignment needed, or could you use @DEFAULT_UNSET instead? >> (Assuming it's for the eclass ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] New mysql eclasses review

2011-04-20 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Hi. On 18-04-2011 23:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote: > >> The mysql team now uses 3 eclasses: mysql-v2.eclass[2] (base >> eclass), mysql-autotools.eclass[3] (for autotools based releases) >> and mysql-cmake.eclass[4] (for cmake based releases)