On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:13 -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
> access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the
> python-bugzilla client that accesses Bugzilla via XML-RPC but it didn't
> seem to work. Do we have
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 17:37:27 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> One thing I noticed is that by default, search now also searches
> "content", instead of just the titles. I rather liked the old
> behavior.
Yes, and it gets weirder when you search for a term that matches a
package name as well as, say,
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 14:17:37 +0100
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christian Ruppert :
> > We're almost done with the preparation of bugzilla-4.x for
> > bugs.gentoo.org. So, do we want the new workflow or do we want to
> > keep the old?
>
> New one, reopened is a bit pointless informatio
On Monday, March 07, 2011 12:35:53 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Am 07.03.2011 11:24, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> > also, i'll be converting the glibc ebuilds do always invoke the
> > multilib_env helper functions. this will allow us to drop the
> > {C,LD}FLAGS_xxx and friends from profiles since glibc was
On Monday, March 07, 2011 16:32:55 Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 07-03-2011 15:06:25 -0500, Olivier Crête wrote:
> > Maybe it's not to protect the user, but to protect the Gentoo
> > infrastructure.. And really, SSL has been supported by every browser for
> > the last 15 years. And it is not in any wa
On Monday, March 07, 2011 16:59:22 Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 07-03-2011 16:52:23 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > In any case, I don't see poor browser design as a valid reason for
> > avoiding the use of SSL...
>
> Please use a MUA that properly honours Reply-To: headers. I'm on the
> list.
subs
On 07-03-2011 16:52:23 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> In any case, I don't see poor browser design as a valid reason for
> avoiding the use of SSL...
Please use a MUA that properly honours Reply-To: headers. I'm on the
list.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> As outsider, I don't like to accept another certificate thing, just to
> view a bugtracker.
When you think about it, this is a defect with your browser, and not
so much with SSL itself.
Your browser generally doesn't complain about unauthen
On 07-03-2011 15:06:25 -0500, Olivier Crête wrote:
> Maybe it's not to protect the user, but to protect the Gentoo
> infrastructure.. And really, SSL has been supported by every browser for
> the last 15 years. And it is not in any way slow or slower than non-SSL.
but the certificate security clic
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:48:19 +0100
> Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > >> If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we
> > > >> can decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encr
On 03/07/2011 08:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:48:19 +0100
> Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we
> can decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
>>>
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:48:19 +0100
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >> If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we
> > >> can decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
> > >
> > > Is there any *real* reason to force SSL?
Am 07.03.2011 11:24, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> i plan on punting these (hardly used) functions from the
> multilib.eclass (once the handful of open bugs are closed):
> get_ml_incdir
> prep_ml_includes
> create_ml_includes
> create_ml_includes-absolute
> create_ml_includes-tidy_path
> cr
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (07 Mar 2011)
> # No longer needed package wrt #330397. Removal in 30 days.
> media-libs/glitz
>
>
And there was much celebration amongst the populi!
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
# Samuli Suominen (07 Mar 2011)
# No longer needed package wrt #330397. Removal in 30 days.
media-libs/glitz
On 16:35 Mon 07 Mar , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 15:13, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
> > access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the
> > python-bugzilla client that accesses Bugzilla via
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 15:13, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
> access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the
> python-bugzilla client that accesses Bugzilla via XML-RPC but it didn't
> seem to work. Do we have anythin
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can
>> >> decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
>> >
>> > Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/2011 09:48 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can
decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
>>>
>>> Is
Hi!
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can
> >> decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
> >
> > Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
>
> it should of course be force for loggin
On 09:51 Mon 07 Mar , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The Gentoo for the Bugzilla service went perfectly, a huge thanks to
> idl0r for the years of work he has put into them.
Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried u
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:40:23 -0800
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:44:47AM +0100, Michaaa GGGrny wrote:
> > This should help with all the issues mentioned, including binpkg
> > support. Moreover, user could use the tool manually to restore/reset
> > filecaps if they were lost or
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
> We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
> We expect our update to finish within the next hours.
>
> Some notes:
> SSL is
Am Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:44:13 +0100
schrieb "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." :
> As the package seems rather unmaintained, I'm going to wait for a
> while and check in the ebuild if nobody is against that.
>
> Any feedback is welcome, please let me know what you think.
I have a printer using foo2zjs and have
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:44:47AM +0100, Michaaa GGGrny wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 17:34:29 +0100
> Constanze Hausner wrote:
>
> > On 17:44 Sat 05 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > * some filesystems don't support xattrs at all, and the package
> > > manager needs to support installing to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07-03-2011 08:51, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>> our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
>> We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
>> We
Michał Górny posted on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:34:55 +0100 as excerpted:
> I'd say, both to UNCONFIRMED. Before, we used to set 'NEW' for newly-
> added bugs and didn't use UNCONFIRMED often. Right now, it seems logical
> to use UNCONFIRMED for the new bugs and let devs (re-)confirm them as
> necessar
i plan on punting these (hardly used) functions from the
multilib.eclass (once the handful of open bugs are closed):
get_ml_incdir
prep_ml_includes
create_ml_includes
create_ml_includes-absolute
create_ml_includes-tidy_path
create_ml_includes-listdirs
create_ml_includes-makedestdirs
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 08:24:46AM +0100, "Paweee Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/6/11 1:50 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> >> "NEW" will become "CONFIRMED"
> >
> > This seems mildly insane; sure you didn't mean UNCONFIRMED?
>
> I don't understand that concern. There is UNCONFIRMED and NEW, now you'd
> g
On 07/03/11 10:51, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The Gentoo for the Bugzilla service went perfectly, a huge thanks to
> idl0r for the years of work he has put into them.
>
Thanks for all your work on this.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
> We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
> We expect our update to finish within the next hours.
All completed now. If you run into any problem
# Pacho Ramos (26 Jan 2011)
# It makes gnome-panel-2.32 to crash, since upstream looks dead
# any help on fixing bug 348123 is highly appreciated.
# Will be removed around 2011-04-07.
gnome-extra/quick-lounge-applet
_
Was masked since 26 Jan but upstream is still unresponsive and bug
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:12:14AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:55:31 +0100
> Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > SSL is enabled by default now, so it's forced. Unfortunately the
> > option to force SSL *only* for logged in user is no longer available
> > in Bugzilla-4.x. It has be
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:24:33 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:12, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
>
> Do you mean that SSL is slow or that bugs is slow? I also noticed that
> Bugzilla is very slow right now, but it seems
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:55:31 +0100 Christian Ruppert wrote:
>> SSL is enabled by default now, so it's forced. Unfortunately the
>> option to force SSL *only* for logged in user is no longer available
>> in Bugzilla-4.x. It has been added in earl
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:12, Michał Górny wrote:
> Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
Do you mean that SSL is slow or that bugs is slow? I also noticed that
Bugzilla is very slow right now, but it seems unlikely that it's due
to SSL.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:55:31 +0100
Christian Ruppert wrote:
> SSL is enabled by default now, so it's forced. Unfortunately the
> option to force SSL *only* for logged in user is no longer available
> in Bugzilla-4.x. It has been added in early 3.x AFAIR and later
> replaced by forcing SSL at all
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 17:34:29 +0100
Constanze Hausner wrote:
> On 17:44 Sat 05 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > * some filesystems don't support xattrs at all, and the package
> > manager needs to support installing to them, even if the user is
> > building on a filesystem that does support it
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 13:22:09 +0100
Christian Ruppert wrote:
> "NEW" will become "CONFIRMED"
> "REOPENED" will become "CONFIRMED" (and the "REOPENED" status will
> be removed)
I'd say, both to UNCONFIRMED. Before, we used to set 'NEW' for newly-
added bugs and didn't use UNCONFIRMED often. Ri
39 matches
Mail list logo
