Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work

2011-03-02 Thread Kevin McCarthy
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:01:59PM +0100, justin wrote: > On 01/03/11 08:32, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > Things for > > > Herd: sci > Herd: sci-chemistry > Maintainer: marku...@gentoo.org > Maintainer: cr...@gentoo.org > Maintainer: j...@gentoo.org > > > are fixed. > Herd: desktop-misc Herd: ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work

2011-03-02 Thread justin
On 01/03/11 08:32, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz >> wrote: >>> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in order to prepare for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding app-arch/xz-utils to the system set

2011-03-02 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi again. On 31-01-2011 22:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Hello. > > Given the increased use of lzma compressed files, including on portage > snapshots, I'd like to add app-arch/xz-utils to the system set. > We already have a few bugs about

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work

2011-03-02 Thread justin
Could you provide a script, which checks and/or reports on ebuild basis, which has to be fixed? It seems you already have one to create the list you sent around. Thanks justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Adding app-arch/xz-utils to the system set

2011-03-02 Thread Torsten Veller
* Jeremy Olexa : > Well, the interesting bit of info is that the wider developer > community maybe already assumes it to be in the system set. *OR* can't > be bothered to remember that it is NOT in the system set. The data to > back up this statement is in https://bugs.gentoo.org/349315 in which >

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium icon theme dependencies, help needed

2011-03-02 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Does anyone else want to comment on this? On 2/25/11 5:43 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:42 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." > wrote: >> Portage obviously doesn't know which DE the user is running (multiple >> DE's may be installed on the system), so I don't see a way to create >> "fo