Hi,
El 01/27/11 18:24, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 01/27/2011 09:05 AM, Matthew Summers wrote:
>> Now, as to whether to include the value ESVN_PASSWORD in the ebuild, I would
>> not do that. Personally, I would setup svn+ssh and use an ssh key to access
>> the repo. I do this with git using the git
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:42:19 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> 1. It makes sense that in the event that a "Rogue" developer is
> wreaking havoc on the tree that QA can get infra to suspend their
> commit rights. That's safeguarding the tree in the face of imminent
> harm. This should generally be li
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:39:15 -0600
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> We're here to create an awesome source-based distribution, not
> pretend we're United Nations and the U.S. government all rolled into
> one. =)
I've been observing for a few years now how sometimes a developer leans
toward a more corpor
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:00:24 -0500
Dane Smith wrote:
> I whole-heartedly disagree with this. First off, the "line in the
> sand" concept is completely unnecessary in this case. It barely makes
> sense when it's used on a massive scale (can't drink until 21 in the
> US), and it only makes sense th
On Monday 31 January 2011 04:54:47 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I decided to start migrating some CVS and SVN repos to git. First I should
> do a cleanup though, and see which ones are still active.
> 1) gentoo-src [1] cvs repo contains a number of projects separated to
> directories. Mos
Hello,
I decided to start migrating some CVS and SVN repos to git. First I should do
a cleanup though, and see which ones are still active.
1) gentoo-src [1] cvs repo contains a number of projects separated to
directories. Most of them seem really old and inactive. I'd like to point me
out the
On 14:07 Sat 29 Jan , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Since QA is getting lots of powers these days, I strongly object to
> this, see also my comment on becoming a QA member. I suggest the
> following:
>
> The QA lead is yearly elected by the whole dev-community (active
> developers), same procedu
On 22:11 Fri 28 Jan , Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
> first off i would like to apologize for not sending this mail sooner
> (helluva week).
>
> So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~sc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2011 08:07 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 28-01-2011 22:11:30 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
>>
>> Please comment and he
* Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb:
> GitHub _used_ to be broken and provide non-stable downloads, but they
> have since fixed that and the download of a tag will always have the
> same SHA512 digest, so it's just fine.
That's great. How exactly did they do that ?
IIRC one of the problems is/was that
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-01-30 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-vim/latexsuite 2011-01-24 06:47:41
radhermit
Additions:
app-vim/vim-latex 2011-01-24 06:32:
On 1/25/11 1:30 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> QA is not a solution to everything. The problem Tomas is trying to
> counter here is the idle/slacking arches. If the arch is active but have some
> concerns regarding the stabilization then let the maintainer deal with
> it. This is the way we do it now
On 1/28/11 10:11 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
I'd suggest to split the diff, discussion and voting to make it more
focused:
1) QA team lead, deputy, and accepting new members of
Our bug queue has 81 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click one of the following links:
http: http://bit.ly/bsHeJt
https: http://bit.ly/8Z4xUU
Thanks!
14 matches
Mail list logo
