Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-java/maven-bin: ChangeLog maven-bin-1.0.2.ebuild maven-bin-1.1-r1.ebuild maven-bin-1.1.ebuild

2011-01-18 Thread Serkan Kaba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Java packages doesn't support slotmove. The slot number is used extensively everywhere including reverse dependencies. On 19-01-2011 04:09, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:58:27 + (UTC), Miroslav Sulc (fordfrog) wrote: >> fordfrog

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-java/maven-bin: ChangeLog maven-bin-1.0.2.ebuild maven-bin-1.1-r1.ebuild maven-bin-1.1.ebuild

2011-01-18 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:58:27 + (UTC), Miroslav Sulc (fordfrog) wrote: fordfrog11/01/19 01:58:27 Modified: ChangeLog Added:maven-bin-1.0.2.ebuild maven-bin-1.1-r1.ebuild Removed: maven-bin-1.1.ebuild Log: dev-java/maven-bin: resurrected

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bugzilla cleanup: remove SECURITY keyword?

2011-01-18 Thread Alex Legler
On 1/18/11 4:06 PM, Torsten Veller wrote: > * Alex Legler : >> On 1/18/11 3:31 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >>> Is it worthwhile to remove the SECURITY keyword from 79 bugs... >> >> It is not, we would have told you before if you had actually asked >> us. (hoping you get the

[gentoo-dev] Re: bugzilla cleanup: remove SECURITY keyword?

2011-01-18 Thread Torsten Veller
* Alex Legler : > On 1/18/11 3:31 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > > >> Is it worthwhile to remove the SECURITY keyword from 79 bugs... > > It is not, we would have told you before if you had actually asked > us. (hoping you get the hint) Paweł actually asked: "What do you thin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bugzilla cleanup: remove SECURITY keyword?

2011-01-18 Thread Alex Legler
On 1/18/11 3:31 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > >> Is it worthwhile to remove the SECURITY keyword from 79 bugs... It is not, we would have told you before if you had actually asked us. (hoping you get the hint) >> >> ...if you consider that (if everyone gets keyword-changes bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bugzilla cleanup: remove SECURITY keyword?

2011-01-18 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 1/18/11 2:45 PM, Torsten Veller wrote: > What sort of confusion does SECURITY add? I started thinking about it when https://bugs.gentoo.org/351922 was filed (this is only an example). The SECURITY keyword is not applied consistently (~80 bugs total), but the description says "Add this on all s

[gentoo-dev] Re: bugzilla cleanup: remove SECURITY keyword?

2011-01-18 Thread Torsten Veller
* "\"Paweł Hajdan, Jr.\"" : > I've noticed we have a SECURITY keyword on bugs.gentoo.org, but only 79 > bugs have it, and doesn't seem to be actively used, so it seems to only > add confusion. > > What do you think about removing it? What sort of confusion does SECURITY add? Do other keywords[1]

[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 88 bugs

2011-01-18 Thread Alex Alexander
Our bug queue has 88 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click one of the following links: http: http://bit.ly/bsHeJt https: http://bit.ly/8Z4xUU Thanks!

Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla cleanup: remove SECURITY keyword?

2011-01-18 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 1/17/11 6:00 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote: > All 79 bugs would need a fix then. We can't remove used keywords/groups > and so on. Only two bugs with SECURITY keywords are still open: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_t