On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 00:08:34 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday, January 01, 2011 23:09:11 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > BTW: several blog/maillist postings talked about the problem that
> > even on recompile, older library versions could be linked in even
> > on recompile.
>
> you'll need to
On Sunday, January 02, 2011 00:17:03 Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > Well, I'm still using portage-2.1, so I wans't aware of whats going
> > on there. For now it seems the preservation is still done explicitly
> > (preserve_old_lib calls in certain ebuilds ?).
On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Well, I'm still using portage-2.1, so I wans't aware of whats going
> on there. For now it seems the preservation is still done explicitly
> (preserve_old_lib calls in certain ebuilds ?). My proposal is to
> record the necessary information (eg. which
On Saturday, January 01, 2011 23:09:11 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> BTW: several blog/maillist postings talked about the problem that
> even on recompile, older library versions could be linked in even
> on recompile.
you'll need to provide an actual example. i have yet to see one.
-mike
signature.a
* Micha?? Górny schrieb:
> > What do you think about this idea ?
>
> You mean what do we think about portage-2.2 and preserved-libs?
Well, I'm still using portage-2.1, so I wans't aware of whats going
on there. For now it seems the preservation is still done explicitly
(preserve_old_lib calls i
On 12/31/2010 12:29 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 12/30/2010 07:37 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> As the text was just approved it will take a while before Package
>> Managers release new versions that declare support for EAPI 4. As such,
>> the new EAPI 4 can't yet be used in the main tree. You will be n
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> I don't see a reason to deprecate an EAPI, unless you are out to
> stop a specific feature from being used that was introduced in a
> later EAPI and breaks the earlier EAPI. Those ebuilds should be
> converted or otherwise taken care of, but it st
