Re: [gentoo-dev] Summary of suggested new features in EAPI="4"

2010-12-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 22:21 Sat 18 Dec , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:48:26 -0600 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > I don't know of anyone who's actually done this, but setting IUSE > > based on ACCEPT_KEYWORDS being ~arch should be possible. There may be > > better or easier solutions. > > Uhm...

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-12-19 23h59 UTC

2010-12-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2010-12-19 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-themes/neu-icon-theme 2010-12-13 19:31:31 ssuominen dev-tex/ha-prosper 2010-12-16 13:14:23 aballier gnome-base/gn

Re: [gentoo-dev] What are || ( ) dependencies?

2010-12-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:22:07 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > >> What about if you decide upon a early on, and then later on > >> something hard-depends upon b? > > > > Then you're collapsing the graph too early. =) > > (speaking as an utter novice) > > This is the same kind of case as in bug 264434. W

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What are || ( ) dependencies?

2010-12-19 Thread Matti Bickel
On 12/18/2010 08:35 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:25:04 + > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> So would anyone be especially opposed to making "best leftmost" an >> explicit requirement, enforced by repoman where possible (at least for >> the >= / < case)? > > I already thought that