On 12/15/10 1:16 PM, Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:22:14 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 20:54:45 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:00:02 +0200 (EET) Alex Alexander wrote:
Our bug queue has 118 bugs!
>>>
>>> I am starting to
>
> If the script could be improved to give the date and bug number (maybe
> with title/summary?) of the oldest unassigned one as well, and trigger a
> warning if it were more than, say, three days old, as well as by queue
> length, that might be nice, too. However I recognize that's easy to say
>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> By the way, we have a nice team of arch and herd testers - how about
> encouraging them to wrangle some bugs?
Yeah, I just came here to say this. One certainly doesn't need to have
completed the developer quizzes to sort bugs.
Matt
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>+ sed -e
>"1s:^#![[:space:]]*\([^[:space:]]*/usr/bin/env[[:space:]]\)\?[[:space:]]*\([^[:space:]]*/\)\?\(jython\|python\)\([[:digit:]]\+\(\.[[:digit:]]\+\)\?\)\?\(\$\|[[:space:]].*\):#!\1\2${python_interpr
On 12/15/10 2:54 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> I am starting to wonder if this is helping. It looks like everyone now
> attempts to keep it <100 on a daily basis, but not to far <100, which
> means a lot of old, difficult, nasty bug reports are left unattended.
> Still, I got it down to about two doz
Mike Frysinger posted on Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:22:14 -0500 as excerpted:
> On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 20:54:45 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:00:02 +0200 (EET) Alex Alexander wrote:
>> > Our bug queue has 118 bugs!
>>
>> I am starting to wonder if this is helping. It looks like
On 12/13/2010 11:00 PM, Roy Bamford wrote:
>
> Markos,
>
> Interesting - How can you address future strategy and plans without
> addressing Gentoos meta structure too. It could not be a purely
> technical talk ... but thats what interests me.
>
There's no restriction for the talks to be techn
On 15/12/10 12:06, justin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after testing this, and I have to say it mostly works smooth and fine, I
> hit a huge problem.
>
> I wanted to emerge a package which just depends on glibc provided libs
> for the oposite ABI my main ABI is. This specific package has an
> optional suppor
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 20:54:45 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:00:02 +0200 (EET) Alex Alexander wrote:
> > Our bug queue has 118 bugs!
>
> I am starting to wonder if this is helping. It looks like everyone now
> attempts to keep it <100 on a daily basis, but not to far <100,
Hi,
after testing this, and I have to say it mostly works smooth and fine, I
hit a huge problem.
I wanted to emerge a package which just depends on glibc provided libs
for the oposite ABI my main ABI is. This specific package has an
optional support for python which would require to have a second
> And rather than trusting gcc
> -march=native to do the work for you, you would probably be better off
> checking `grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo' anyway. :)
>
Gentoo runs not only on Linux (remember about Gentoo Prefix), and this feature
is
system-dependend
--
Regards,
Konstantin
11 matches
Mail list logo
