[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow

On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote: Mike Frysinger writes: well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at that point. Is there so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow

On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote: > Mike Frysinger writes: > > well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the > > masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at > > that point. > > Is there somewhere which tells users when th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cobra as a Python replacement for portage infra...

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:52, Branko Badrljica wrote: > My question is, could existing Portage infrastructure be ported to such > language with minimal effort and would it be worthwile to even try ? I'm guessing not. > There are many operations that now take portage ages to complete, so it > se

[gentoo-dev] Cobra as a Python replacement for portage infra...

( reposted as a new thread. Sorry for inconvenience.) Hi to all, I am sorry if I'm wasting bandwidth on gentoo-dev with this, but I have found no good answere elsewhere. I have accidentally stumbled on Codelite ( at the first glance ) _great_ IDE for C/C++/Python ( http://www.codelite.org ). W

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow

Mike Frysinger writes: > well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the masked > package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at that point. Is there somewhere which tells users when there are upgrades to toolchain packages which are not revbumped once they

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cobra as a Python replacement for portage infra...

dont hijack threads. write a new e-mail from scratch rather than picking some random e-mail and hitting "reply" and deleting all the text. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cobra as a Python replacement for portage infra...

Erm, link is http://cobra-language.com

[gentoo-dev] Cobra as a Python replacement for portage infra...

Hi to all, I am sorry if I'm wasting bandwidth on gentoo-dev with this, but I have found no good answere elsewhere. I have accidentally stumbled on Codelite ( at the first glance ) _great_ IDE for C/C++/Python ( www.codelite.org). While toying with its settings for various language syntaxes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Change policy about live ebuilds

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 05:30:16PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/22/2010 09:09 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > > On 11/21/2010 09:54 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Alexis Ballier wrote: > >> > Also, for an ebuild with empty KEYWORDS, repoman will not indicate > any pr

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow

On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:32:30 -0800 spinugio wrote: > is emerging sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1-r1 enough? Yep. -- fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime @ gentoo.orgEFFD 38

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Change policy about live ebuilds

On 11/22/2010 09:09 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/21/2010 09:54 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> Also, for an ebuild with empty KEYWORDS, repoman will not indicate any problems with dependencies. >> >>> by default with a p.mask it doesnt eith

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Change policy about live ebuilds

On 11/21/2010 09:54 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Alexis Ballier wrote: > >>> Also, for an ebuild with empty KEYWORDS, repoman will not indicate >>> any problems with dependencies. > >> by default with a p.mask it doesnt either. > > Yes, but it has an option to enable it,

[gentoo-dev] Kernel maintainers that use genpatches

For all the kernel maintainers that use genpatches in their kernel package, please make sure you are subscribed to gentoo-kernel so that I know I can reach all of you easily. Thanks, -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Lead E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP