On 11/01/2010 10:06 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> I would like to suggest improvement in handling of EAPI in profiles:
> Some files could optionally end with ":${EAPI}", which would be used to
> specify, which EAPI
> should be used for parsing of given file. It would concern at
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 01:12 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 +
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
> > > I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me
>
> > mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity
>
> In that case, with no committer, it ought to be
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:12:16AM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 +
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
> > > I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me
>
> > mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity
>
> In that case, with no committer, it ough
On 11/02/2010 03:20 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Monday 01 November 2010 13:33:47 Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote:
>> zmedico 10/11/01 16:33:47
>>
>> Modified: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild
>> ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild
>>
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> > I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me
> mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity
In that case, with no committer, it ought to be either a herd or
maintainer-needed.
jer
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:19:51AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> Hi hwoarang,
>
> I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me (which is fine,
> since I guess I'm the meta...) but I was wondering if there was some
> request from mescalinum, or if you're just being proactive?
>
> I have
Hi hwoarang,
I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me (which is fine,
since I guess I'm the meta...) but I was wondering if there was some
request from mescalinum, or if you're just being proactive?
I haven't heard from him for a while, so I might be without a dev to
commit any fix
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:23:36PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote:
> - - ewarn "This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not
> considered to be"
> - - ewarn "a s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote:
- - ewarn "This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not
considered to be"
- - ewarn "a supported server profile at this time. For a supported
server"
- - ewarn "
On Monday 01 November 2010 13:33:47 Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote:
> zmedico 10/11/01 16:33:47
>
> Modified: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild
> ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild
> portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild
>
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:41:34PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Вск, 31/10/2010 в 16:38 +0200, Alex Alexander пишет:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
> > > > Isn't this essentially what the
# Samuli Suominen (02 Nov 2010)
# acerhk fails to build with Linux >= 2.6.30 wrt #277598
# acer_acpi is included in Linux since >= 2.6.25 wrt #208577
# and fails parallel make too
# Removal in 30 days
app-laptop/acerhk
app-laptop/acer_acpi
On 08:09 Tue 02 Nov , "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
> > I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
> > called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
>
> Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category?
In
On 09:11 Fri 29 Oct , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> We now have 2 ideas. It's not even worth applying unless we can get
> closer to 10. If nobody puts up more ideas in the next ~6 hours, we
> won't be participating this year.
Thanks to your help, we got enough ideas just in time to apply. We
sho
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 04:24, Rafael Goncalves Martins
wrote:
> I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
> called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
+1.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:09 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
>> I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
>> called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
>
> Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category?
On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
> I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
> called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category?
Generally sounds good.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
17 matches
Mail list logo
