On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:25:38 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Something I forgot to ask before: are the 'always overflow' warnings new
> > w/ GCC 4.5 / glibc 2.12? If they're new w/ 4.5 then we don't have a
> > problem.
>
> the fortify warnings typically come from glibc, not gcc. i dont believ
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 20:33:52 Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:43:28 +0200 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > since the last time I asked Zac about this it came back to bite me[1]
> > this time I'm going to send the announce to the list first, and if
> > nobody can actually come up wi
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:43:28 +0200
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> since the last time I asked Zac about this it came back to bite me[1]
> this time I'm going to send the announce to the list first, and if
> nobody can actually come up with a good reason not to, I'm going to ask
> Zac tomorrow to re-
On Monday 27 September 2010 21:53:18 Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been too busy with other things to work on Gentoo for quite some
> time and this isn't going to change now that I've just picked up new
> study and work commitments.
>
> So I'm gonna drop out of the IRC rooms and stop checkin
Il giorno mar, 28/09/2010 alle 12.33 -0700, Alec Warner ha scritto:
> Its not clear to me what your purpose is. It is likely that many
> developers will be unable to do 1. Does that concern you? Should
> developers ask QA for help on packages?
Fixing the package is the solution, it's usually q
Hi,
> > you did it the correct way but that's what happens when you're alone in a
> > team and are moving without reliable internet connection then emails &
> > other stuff start to pile up :/
>
> I'm sorry, I did not want to be pushy in any way... :|
No problem at all; had I set my .away you co
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 15:33:10 Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > since the last time I asked Zac about this it came back to bite me[1]
> > this time I'm going to send the announce to the list first, and if
> > nobody can actually come up wi
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since the last time I asked Zac about this it came back to bite me[1]
> this time I'm going to send the announce to the list first, and if
> nobody can actually come up with a good reason not to, I'm going to ask
> Zac tomorr
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 19:53 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I've been too busy with other things to work on Gentoo for quite some
> time and this isn't going to change now that I've just picked up new
> study and work commitments.
You will be missed Daniel. It was always pleasant working with you.
On 09/28/2010 12:43 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>
> So if you want to have your say, gentoo-qa is there for that.
>
You should not cross post like this. Following the recent discussion the
only list allowing cross posting is gentoo-dev-announce.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description:
Hi all,
since the last time I asked Zac about this it came back to bite me[1]
this time I'm going to send the announce to the list first, and if
nobody can actually come up with a good reason not to, I'm going to ask
Zac tomorrow to re-enable the feature.
What is this about? Portage already repor
11 matches
Mail list logo
