Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Handling of test USE flag in ebuilds

2010-09-15 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 09/15/2010 08:02 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > From discussion on IRC, it seems, like there are different options, so i > would like to clarify this > policy: > > The test USE flag is (i am only talking about portage now, since i am most > familar with it) an > internal flag, which is added by p

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Handling of test USE flag in ebuilds

2010-09-15 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:02:00 +0200 Thomas Sachau wrote: > From discussion on IRC, it seems, like there are different options, so i > would like to clarify this > policy: > > The test USE flag is (i am only talking about portage now, since i am most > familar with it) an > internal flag, which

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Handling of test USE flag in ebuilds

2010-09-15 Thread Thomas Sachau
From discussion on IRC, it seems, like there are different options, so i would like to clarify this policy: The test USE flag is (i am only talking about portage now, since i am most familar with it) an internal flag, which is added by portage for every ebuild and enabled/disabled based on FEAT

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reassignments of closed bugs / clus...@gentoo.org use as bugzilla user

2010-09-15 Thread Kacper Kowalik
W dniu 15.09.2010 00:18, Krzysztof Pawlik pisze: > On 09/15/10 00:03, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> Hello, whoever you are, clus...@gentoo.org, >> >> >> please be aware that it's customary to not reassign bugs once they have >> been definitively CLOSED or RESOLVED. Just stop doing it. >> >> Also, d