On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:39:59 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:32, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > After a discussion on IRC, a few of us were considering the value of
> > adding suggestions on handling of bugs in Bugzilla from a developer (and
> > editbugs user) perspective.
>
Hi,
Michael Weber :
> What about user issued KEYWORD/STABLE-REQ on maintainer-nee...@g.o
> assignd bugs/packages?
>
> Close as RESO/WONTFIX or add the arches?
Common sense. Practice has been to add arches if it fixes a problem
in a current stable, if there is no stable version available or the
On 09/06/2010 10:39 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:32, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> After a discussion on IRC, a few of us were considering the value of
>> adding suggestions on handling of bugs in Bugzilla from a developer (and
>> editbugs user) perspective.
>
> Good idea,
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:39:59 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman
wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > 2.2. Security bugs
> > The developer should comment, but ONLY members of the security team
> > should:
> > - change whiteboard
> > - add/remove arches
> > - change bug status/reso
>
> The arches can still remove thems
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:10:41 +0200, Christian Faulhammer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Robin H. Johnson" :
> > 2.2. Security bugs
> > The developer should comment, but ONLY members of the security
> > team should:
> > - change whiteboard
> > - add/remove arches
>
> As security may be grateful for any
Hi,
"Robin H. Johnson" :
> 2.2. Security bugs
> The developer should comment, but ONLY members of the security team
> should:
> - change whiteboard
> - add/remove arches
As security may be grateful for any kind of help, those two actions is
often done by the maintainers.
V-Li
--
Chris
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 07:30 +, Michael Weber (xmw) a écrit :
> xmw 10/09/06 07:30:05
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:hardware-monitor-1.4.3.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump to fix bug #328735
> (Portage version: 2.1.8.3/cvs/Linux x86_64)
[...]
>
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:32, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> After a discussion on IRC, a few of us were considering the value of
> adding suggestions on handling of bugs in Bugzilla from a developer (and
> editbugs user) perspective.
Good idea, I've been confused about the interaction models here.
>
Hi,
After a discussion on IRC, a few of us were considering the value of
adding suggestions on handling of bugs in Bugzilla from a developer (and
editbugs user) perspective.
These is the simplest set I have to start, but I'd really like other
comments and ideas.
1. General case
- You should on
On 09/06/2010 12:28 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> - Am I expected to run revdep-rebuild after every emerge -uavDN world now?
Yes, that's always been the case.
> - If so, can we get more integration with emerge itself?
I'd like us to add EAPI support for abi-slot dependencies, as
discussed in thes
Hi there,
I had a different problem with the db upgrade last week: postfix
broke. I had to run revdep-rebuild to fix it; this is fine, except
that nothing prompted me to run revdep-rebuild. So:
- Am I expected to run revdep-rebuild after every emerge -uavDN world now?
- If so, can we get more int
11 matches
Mail list logo
