On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Diego E. Pettenò wrote:
>
> # Diego E. Pettenņ (30 Aug 2010)
> # on behalf of QA team
> #
> # Initial import in 2005 and never bumped; no users in tree;
What does 'no users in tree' mean? No revdeps?
> # since revision 1.2 it has been installing the conf.d fil
Mike Frysinger posted on Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:03:21 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Monday, August 30, 2010 10:14:48 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
>> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year
>> old. This either m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
On 30-08-2010 16:36, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 05:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Hi there
>>
>> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
>> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3
Hello fellow developers.
On 08/30/2010 04:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> Sounds good to me, but I'd actually be more interested in having
> something the other way around; i.e. monitoring for activity in
> commits, bugzilla, IRC and maybe the -dev mailing list to see if
> people are still active
On 08/30/10 08:20, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 16:14, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
>> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
>> This
>> either means that these devs are inact
# Diego E. Pettenò (30 Aug 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Initial import in 2005 and never bumped; no users in tree;
# since revision 1.2 it has been installing the conf.d file
# over the init.d (so it never really worked).
#
# Removal on 2010-10-29
net-misc/omnievents
# Diego E. Pettenò (30 Aug 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Package was added in 2004 and never bumped; the installed
# "init script" is not compatible with Gentoo's init system.
#
# Removal on 2010-10-29
net-mail/ixbiff
On Monday, August 30, 2010 10:14:48 Markos Chandras wrote:
> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
> This either means that these devs are inactive since then or that they
> came back and jus
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 07:36:29PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 05:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
> > system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
> > This
> > eith
On 08/30/2010 05:14 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Hi there
>
> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
> This
> either means that these devs are inactive since then or that they came back
> an
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 16:14, Markos Chandras wrote:
> It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
> system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old.
> This
> either means that these devs are inactive since then or that they came back
> and just
Hi there
It seems to me that people paying less and less attention to devaway
system[1]. As you may see yourselves, few of the entries are 2-3 year old. This
either means that these devs are inactive since then or that they came back
and just didn't bother updating their status. Is it possible for
# Diego E. Pettenò (30 Aug 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Last version bump in 2003; GNU coreutils has stat(1)
# already; BusyBox has its own applet; *BSD have their own
# stat command.
#
# Removal on 2010-10-29
sys-apps/stat
On 08/27/2010 04:26 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 26-08-2010 12:07, Alex Legler wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:01:27 +0200, Markus Duft
>> wrote:
>
>>> booth registration is not yet open, i will have an eye on this too...
>>> (is there any interest in it anyway? who could come up w
14 matches
Mail list logo
