В Пнд, 16/08/2010 в 18:04 +, Alexey Shvetsov (alexxy) пишет:
> alexxy 10/08/16 18:04:52
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:drupal-5.23.ebuild drupal-6.19.ebuild
> Removed: drupal-6.16.ebuild drupal-6.17.ebuild
> drupal-5.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:24:45 -0700
Alec Warner wrote:
> I have access to main/en and I am willing to do website stuff; just
> nothing with a quick turnaround.
>
> I know guidexml and enough xsl to be dangerous.
Excellent. I've been the defacto www@ team for as long as I can remember. More
help
I have access to main/en and I am willing to do website stuff; just
nothing with a quick turnaround.
I know guidexml and enough xsl to be dangerous.
-A
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 17 August 2010 02:43, Joshua Saddler wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300
>
i think we've seen enough improvement/bugfixes in ~arch sandbox over
current stable sandbox-1.6 and things have settled down. there are
certainly a few bugs open that arent technically regressions with
sandbox-1.6 to older versions, but are none the less causing problems
for current stable package
On 17 August 2010 02:43, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part of
>> the
>> webpage like dosc or pr teams
>
> Common misconception. Neither the GDP, PR, or even Releng is di
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:43:06 -0700
> Joshua Saddler wrote:
>> That said, I've been looking at the proposed changes, so I'll be implementing
>> some or all of them soon, probably today, time permitting.
>
> I'm not going to be able to get to
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:43:06 -0700
Joshua Saddler wrote:
> That said, I've been looking at the proposed changes, so I'll be implementing
> some or all of them soon, probably today, time permitting.
I'm not going to be able to get to this, so anyone else with commit access to
/main/en/ can feel f
Il giorno mar, 17/08/2010 alle 00.43 +0200, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto:
>
> Please compile and run them against dev-libs/libevent-2.0.6 to see if
> anything breaks, and file bug reports for those packages (or versions)
> that do. When you do, make those block the tracker bug #333077 [1].
I'll set
Le samedi 14 août 2010 à 18:29 +0200, Peter Hjalmarsson a écrit :
> lör 2010-08-14 klockan 15:14 +0300 skrev Samuli Suominen:
> > > [1] Last time I did a bugreport about this, here is the answer:
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310681
> >
> > Long story short:
> >
> > If package has
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300
Markos Chandras wrote:
> You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part of the
> webpage like dosc or pr teams
Common misconception. Neither the GDP, PR, or even Releng is directly
responsible for those pages, though all three teams ha
If you are a Gentoo developer and are using www-client/chromium, please
consider joining the "Chromium in Gentoo" project:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/chromium/index.xml
You don't need to modify or bump packages to join. In fact, I'm rather
looking for good testers. We have some bugs to
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le lundi 16 août 2010 à 16:07 +0400, Peter Volkov a écrit :
>> This was discussed many times here and since every time we had same
>> consensus the policy is in place. It's just not written in devmanual
>> or
>> gentoo.org/doc.
>
> Pr
Le lundi 16 août 2010 à 16:07 +0400, Peter Volkov a écrit :
> This was discussed many times here and since every time we had same
> consensus the policy is in place. It's just not written in devmanual
> or
> gentoo.org/doc.
Preceeding didn't seem to make it through (yet), so here it goes:
please
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:58:32PM -0700, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 8/8/10 6:22 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest a cleanup of our "Get Gentoo" page. It is one of the
> > more important pages, because every new user has to visit it.
> >
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~phajdan
В Сбт, 14/08/2010 в 18:29 +0200, Peter Hjalmarsson пишет:
> lör 2010-08-14 klockan 15:14 +0300 skrev Samuli Suominen:
> > > [1] Last time I did a bugreport about this, here is the answer:
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310681
> >
> > Long story short:
> >
> > If package has SSL sup
В Сбт, 14/08/2010 в 20:06 +0300, Markos Chandras пишет:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:26:36PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > > So you want me to force everyone to update the package just to respect
> > > the LDFLAGS.
> >
> > yes. IIRC it has been stated on this list before, that a change which
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
