Re: [gentoo-dev] nsbrowser plugins

2010-08-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Hanno Böck wrote: > Am Dienstag 10 August 2010 schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.: >> Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins. >> However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what >> many software projects (including Chromi

Re: [gentoo-dev] nsbrowser plugins

2010-08-11 Thread Hanno Böck
Am Dienstag 10 August 2010 schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.: > Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins. > However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what > many software projects (including Chromium) target. > > Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins inst

Re: [gentoo-dev] nsbrowser plugins

2010-08-11 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:12:39 -0700 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Could you give an example? I'm just curious. Different distros use > different paths, so that could lead to problems. Or are they trying to > recognize the running distro? www-plugins/adobe-flash: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg

Re: [gentoo-dev] nsbrowser plugins

2010-08-11 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 8/10/10 9:51 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > Hardcoding paths is a bad design™. Well, yeah, it could be done better. Hmm, I will think more about it. On 8/10/10 9:54 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: > Why can chromium not do like firefox and others and make the plugins > dir scalable via a wrapper scri

Re: [gentoo-dev] nsbrowser plugins

2010-08-11 Thread Luca Barbato
On 08/10/2010 11:29 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins. > However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what > many software projects (including Chromium) target. And that is bad. > Why are we using nsbrowser

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS

2010-08-11 Thread Thilo Bangert
Markos Chandras said: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:31:52PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > >> It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track > > >> down > > >> packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-st

[gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS

2010-08-11 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:31:52PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > >> It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track > >> down > >> packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-style=gnu is a > >> good way > >> t