On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:15 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> I have noticed that this list and the gentoo-releng irc channel
> have been dead for a very long time, and I remember seeing a post a
> while back in which agaffney announced his retirement. Also there are
> multiple bugs open on livecd-tools,
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-08-08 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-libs/excelformat2010-08-04 07:28:55
jlec
net-misc/amazonmp3 2010-08-05 12:10:0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
following Ioannis extended leave of absence for 1 year, we've reviewed
the packages he was maintaining and reassigned them.
The following list of packages are now in need of a new maintainer. Any
Gentoo Developer willing to maintain them please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08-08-2010 11:28, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 16:47:42 +0530
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>>> Uh, it *was* requested for a vote, and the Council decided instead
>>> to vote on something else and not upon what was asked.
>>
>> So you as
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 16:47:42 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> > Uh, it *was* requested for a vote, and the Council decided instead
> > to vote on something else and not upon what was asked.
>
> So you ask again in the next meeting. And if it happens again, you
> file a protest. If it still happens,
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:06:51AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> >>
> > The inactivity of many herds most of the time blocks the work of some other
> > herds. Isn't council's responsibility to step up and resolve these
> > interproject issues? It shouldn't be that difficult to ask for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07-08-2010 21:15, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I have noticed that this list and the gentoo-releng irc channel
> have been dead for a very long time, and I remember seeing a post a
> while back in which agaffney announced his retirement. Also t
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 03:05:34 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
>> A tie, with a decision to revisit next meeting- the next meeting it
>> was decided that yes, g55 is addressing what can be considered a real
>> issue. And in the 14 months since t
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:16:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> obviously you only mean linux x86/amd64 dev profiles. i dont have a strong
> opinion on that small subset in either direction.
> -mike
Yes, sorry I only meant the linux profiles
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Develop
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:18:03AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 03:05:34 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > > GLEP 55 *was* put up for a vote, along with GLEP 54, on 20090514.
> > > GLEP 54 was accepted subject to GLEP 55 being approved. The vote on
> > > GLEP 55 was a tie.
> >
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:19:05AM +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 08/08/2010 alle 03.11 +0300, Markos Chandras ha scritto:
> > We could at least enable that on x86/amd64 dev profiles (since only
> > devs are
> > supposed to use them and they are the most used arches among us) jus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06-08-2010 22:54, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:47:36PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 08/04/2010 08:34 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 08/04/2010 02:50 PM,
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 03:05:34 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> > GLEP 55 *was* put up for a vote, along with GLEP 54, on 20090514.
> > GLEP 54 was accepted subject to GLEP 55 being approved. The vote on
> > GLEP 55 was a tie.
>
> A tie, with a decision to revisit next meeting- the next meeting it
> wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 8.8.2010 12:05, Brian Harring napsal(a):
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:10:01AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 01:55:26 -0700
>> Brian Harring wrote:
>>> Put it to a vote then, rather than flaming every few months that g55
>>>
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:10:01AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 01:55:26 -0700
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > Put it to a vote then, rather than flaming every few months that g55
> > solves all EAPI issues/world hunger.
> >
> > Seriously, if the people wanting g55 can't be both
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 01:55:26 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> Put it to a vote then, rather than flaming every few months that g55
> solves all EAPI issues/world hunger.
>
> Seriously, if the people wanting g55 can't be bothered to try and
> make their proposal accepted/official, than all they're doi
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 08:46:07AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 15:48:32 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
> > Regardless of my personal opinions about the technical issues on this
> > glep, I agree with the above statement. I am personally tired of
> > seeing the discussion flar
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 10:57:34 +0300
Petteri Räty wrote:
> I suggest making the dev profiles just pull in a binutils version that
> automatically enables the support (excluding profiles where binutils is
> not used).
Cutting off a portion of binutils versions in the tree to developers
does not see
On 08/08/2010 03:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 05:15:04PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>> Why not just set some LDFLAGS that totally won't work (-Wl, taters)
>> and then assume anything that actually compiles with those flags set
>> does not respect LDFLAGS. Set that up o
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 15:48:32 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> Regardless of my personal opinions about the technical issues on this
> glep, I agree with the above statement. I am personally tired of
> seeing the discussion flare up every few months and go nowhere.
Have you considered that it flares u
20 matches
Mail list logo
