Can we do away with all the extra foo && return bullshit and just set a trap?
trap "eshopts pop" RETURN
?
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> now that eutils.eclass contains a common version of safely handling shopts
> settings, we can drop the local versionator.eclass cod
Duncan wrote:
Dale posted on Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500 as excerpted:
It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for
them to just go away. Once a thread goes to -project, it just whithers
on the vine and nothing much happens. There may be a need for -project
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
On 19 July 2010 01:27, Duncan<1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
Dale posted on Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500 as excerpted:
It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for
them to just go away. Once a thread goes to -project, it just whi
On 19 July 2010 01:27, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Dale posted on Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for
>> them to just go away. Once a thread goes to -project, it just whithers
>> on the vine and nothi
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-07-18 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-php5/jargon 2010-07-13 11:43:47 mabi
dev-php5/creole 2010-07-13 11:45:30 mabi
net-wireless/bluez-libs 2010-0
Dale posted on Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500 as excerpted:
> It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for
> them to just go away. Once a thread goes to -project, it just whithers
> on the vine and nothing much happens. There may be a need for -project
> but if almost
now that eutils.eclass contains a common version of safely handling shopts
settings, we can drop the local versionator.eclass code that was handling this
and convert it to eutils. seems to work for me, but i rarely use this eclass.
-mike
--- versionator.eclass 18 Jul 2010 21:24:33 - 1.1
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:23:03 +0200
> Matti Bickel wrote:
>
>> On 07/17/2010 09:58 PM, Matti Bickel wrote:
>> > since there's no dev-lang/php-5.1* version in the tree anymore, this
>> > eclass is useless. It will be removed on 17th August 2010.
>
Hey folks, thought I'd ask here, since I can't find answers on what's
maintained in our ipv6 packages.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326771 asks for updates to our sadly
neglected ipv6 guide (http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ipv6.xml). I removed the
note that said to keyword net-dns/totd,
Petteri Räty wrote:
On 07/18/2010 05:21 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Theo Chatzimichos:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer
wrote:
What about getting rid of -project?
V-Li
WHAT? Why??
Because it is useless in my eyes. All
On 07/18/2010 05:21 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Theo Chatzimichos :
>
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer
>> wrote:
>>> What about getting rid of -project?
>>>
>>> V-Li
>>
>> WHAT? Why??
>
> Because it is useless in my eyes. All discussion could also take
>
Hi,
Theo Chatzimichos :
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer
> wrote:
> > What about getting rid of -project?
> >
> > V-Li
>
> WHAT? Why??
Because it is useless in my eyes. All discussion could also take
place here and most people mix it up anyway. The distinction is too
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> What about getting rid of -project?
>
> V-Li
WHAT? Why??
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" :
> I cross-posted this email to both gentoo-dev and gentoo-council mls as
> Brian used the former and Alex started this thread in the latter.
> Which ML do we want to use?
What about getting rid of -project?
V-Li
14 matches
Mail list logo
