On 7/15/10 3:50 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some help here.
Please consider putting some info on the "Staffing needs" page. I think
it really helps more to have a systematic solution than to alert people
periodically.
Paweł
signatur
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:27:08AM +, Duncan wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers posted on Wed, 26 May 2010 05:08:44 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > On Tue, 25 May 2010 23:40:44 +0200
> > Harald van Dijk wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, people like myself who don't normally wrangle bugs but try to help
> >> out occasional
On Thursday 15 of July 2010 16:24:08 Mike Auty wrote:
> On 15/07/10 14:57, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > And what about using portage 2.2 and be done with it. I don't see the
> > point in reinventing the wheel yet again.
>
> I'm using portage-2.2 and have been since it first came out. I find the
>
Maciej Mrozowski posted on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:01 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Thursday 15 of July 2010 12:14:29 Duncan wrote:
>>
>> If I have FEATURE=-preserve-libs, that's what I want. Exceptions
>> should be limited to what will break the toolchain (including
>> revdep-rebuild here, since that
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Mike Auty wrote:
> Ideally, these calls should either adhere to FEATURES="-preserve-libs",
> or there should be a tool that can identify which files portage has
> preserved, and allow easy rebuilding of dependent packages, and removal.
> At the moment, I'm having
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:24:08 +0100, Mike Auty
wrote:
>
> If portage offers a way to turn off functionality (like preserving
> libraries), it should actually turn it off, rather than sometimes turn
> it off...
Yes, you are referring to
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326275 I do believe t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/07/10 14:57, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> And what about using portage 2.2 and be done with it. I don't see the point
> in
> reinventing the wheel yet again.
I'm using portage-2.2 and have been since it first came out. I find the
@set notation i
On Thursday 15 of July 2010 12:14:29 Duncan wrote:
> Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:09:39 +0200 as
>
> excerpted:
> > Le jeudi 15 juillet 2010 à 09:49 +0100, Mike Auty a écrit : [...]
> >
> >> I can live with this for in places where it causes massive breakage
> >> (openssl/l
* Nirbheek Chauhan schrieb:
> Ah, so you want us to use your git repos as patch managers? That
> clears up a few things.
I dont want you to use *my* repos. But I'd like to advocate git-based
workflows (eg. downstream branches w/ rebase, etc) instead of loose
patches. And I'm offering you an prov
Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:09:39 +0200 as
excerpted:
> Le jeudi 15 juillet 2010 à 09:49 +0100, Mike Auty a écrit : [...]
>> I can live with this for in places where it causes massive breakage
>> (openssl/libpng/libjpg), because it's genuinely useful, but I think it
>> shou
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:16:54 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are
> > > in the ca
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:27:16 -0400
Paul Arthur wrote:
> On 2010-07-14, William Hubbs wrote:
>
...
> >
> > I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the
> > ham radio apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part
> > of the media.
>
> But it is a medium. media-*
Le jeudi 15 juillet 2010 à 09:49 +0100, Mike Auty a écrit :
[...]
> I can live with this for in places where it causes massive breakage
> (openssl/libpng/libjpg), because it's genuinely useful, but I think it
> should be restricted to such important packages, or at least disabled by
> FEATURES="-pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry I'm a bit late to the thread,
Just to add that empathy preserves libemapthy in this manner too.
On 05/07/10 17:40, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>
> 1. How is it different than preserved-libs feature from
> portage-2.2 ? The issue
On 07/15/2010 07:36 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I've updated to dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0a today, and it tells me:
>
> Old versions of installed libraries were detected on your system.
> In order to avoid breaking packages that depend on these old libs,
> the libraries are not being removed. You
15 matches
Mail list logo
