On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:56:52AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
>
> It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
> missing maildir directories.
Stock procmail does this already.
>From procmailrc:
If the mailbox is specified to be
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 00:56:52 +0200
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
>
> It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
> missing maildir directories.
Upstream first (TM).
--
fonts, gcc-porting,
On 07/08/2010 01:56 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
>
> It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
> missing maildir directories.
Provide your patches as plain/text attachments like everyone else does,
can't expe
Hi folks,
YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
missing maildir directories.
cu
- Forwarded message from bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org -
From: bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org
Subject: [Bug 322157] [mail-filter/procmail
# Bernard Cafarelli (07 Jul 2010)
# Broken with current stable gnustep base packages
# Details in bugs #318137, #327371, #327389
# Masked for removal in 30 days
gnustep-libs/gdl2
gnustep-libs/gsweb
gnustep-libs/rigs
gnustep-libs/steptalk
gnustep-apps/stshell
Bug #318137 is for gsweb, #327371 for
# Pacho Ramos (07 Jul 2010)
# Dead upstream, no new release since 2006, no longer builds (bug
#316623).
# Masked for removal in 30 days
dev-dotnet/heap-buddy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
