[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue"

2010-06-11 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:02:50 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > I see more and more calls for either 1) "fixing the test suite", as if > that is suddenly not an UPSTREAM issue but the ebuilds' maintainers' > When instead a test suite should do a SKIP but erroneously does a FAIL, > then RESTRICT=test i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

2010-06-11 Thread Ben de Groot
I guess I should have done a proper grep on the tree before my first message. I missed a few more that are now up for grabs: media-sound/ncmpcpp - tanderson?, sound herd app-text/convertlit app-admin/makepasswd app-backup/rsnapshot - proxy maintainer needs new contact app-cdr/recorder - media-opti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

2010-06-11 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Friday 11 of June 2010 21:26:06 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 11 June 2010 21:12, Ben de Groot wrote: > > As I'm retiring, the following packages I maintained need someone else > > to look after them: > > > > media-video/avidemux - video and qt herds (this one needs a version bump) > > media-video/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

2010-06-11 Thread Kacper Kowalik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 11.06.2010 21:12, Ben de Groot pisze: > app-text/wgetpaste <-- this is now maintainer-needed! I would like to grab it > Also, my proxy-maintainers will need new contacts: > x11-wm/echinus - anyone from desktop-wm still active? Alive & kicking,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

2010-06-11 Thread Ben de Groot
On 11 June 2010 21:12, Ben de Groot wrote: > As I'm retiring, the following packages I maintained need someone else > to look after them: > > media-video/avidemux - video and qt herds (this one needs a version bump) > media-video/smplayer - qt and video herds > x11-themes/haematite-xcursors - desk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

2010-06-11 Thread Ben de Groot
As I'm retiring, the following packages I maintained need someone else to look after them: media-video/avidemux - video and qt herds (this one needs a version bump) media-video/smplayer - qt and video herds x11-themes/haematite-xcursors - desktop-misc herd x11-themes/obsidian-xcursors - ,, x11-the

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-wireless/bluez-{libs,utils}

2010-06-11 Thread Pacho Ramos
# Pacho Ramos (11 Jun 2010) # Drop old and deprecated bluez-libs and bluez-utils. Use bluez instead. # Masked for removal in 30 days. # See bug 301630. net-wireless/bluez-libs net-wireless/bluez-utils And really thanks a lot to Samuli for taking care of the hard work (cleaning deps). signa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

2010-06-11 Thread Joseph Jezak
> > Hello > > Let my explain the problem and my suggestion to handle it better (at > least from my point of view) with an example: > > Sometime ago I bumped bluez version from 4.39-r2 to 4.60, with that > bump, a new and *optional* RDEPEND on sys-libs/libcap-ng was added. > Since libcap-ng was not

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: gnome-extra/gnome-vfs-obexftp

2010-06-11 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (11 Jun 2010) # Only used by old bluez-libs and bluez-utils. # Masked for removal in 30 days. # See bug 301630. gnome-extra/gnome-vfs-obexftp

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Petteri Räty
On 11.6.2010 12.32, Thilo Bangert wrote: >> This thread belongs to gentoo-project. > > perhaps its time to reduce the number of mailinglists again. IMHO it > doesnt hurt to have this thread on gentoo-dev and the volume of messages > and their tone here has been sufficiently normal to again allow

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Friday 11 June 2010 10:48:36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > I'm all for moving to LDAP every info that fits and it's possible. Maybe > even things like Gentoo overlays access. That's not possible, as it is not an attribute that the developer himself should touch, but the overlays team only. Further

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

2010-06-11 Thread Thilo Bangert
Pacho Ramos said: > Hello > > Let my explain the problem and my suggestion to handle it better (at > least from my point of view) with an example: > > Sometime ago I bumped bluez version from 4.39-r2 to 4.60, with that > bump, a new and *optional* RDEPEND on sys-libs/libcap-ng was added. > Since

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Thilo Bangert
> This thread belongs to gentoo-project. perhaps its time to reduce the number of mailinglists again. IMHO it doesnt hurt to have this thread on gentoo-dev and the volume of messages and their tone here has been sufficiently normal to again allow for more subjects. just my 2 cents kind regards

[gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy

2010-06-11 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello Let my explain the problem and my suggestion to handle it better (at least from my point of view) with an example: Sometime ago I bumped bluez version from 4.39-r2 to 4.60, with that bump, a new and *optional* RDEPEND on sys-libs/libcap-ng was added. Since libcap-ng was not keyworded in all

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Petteri Räty
On 11.6.2010 6.27, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:07:53PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> Currently, we only need to set a proper message in ~/.away (as talked in >> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml ) when >> becoming "devaway". > Related to integration

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/traits: traits-3.4.0.ebuild

2010-06-11 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Thursday 10 June 2010 23:45:29 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: [...] > This commit only removed some compiler warnings. This adds a cflag preventing the compiler to make some assumptions on the code for its optimisations, hence making the code slower/bigger. While the changelog ent

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 11/06/2010 в 09:48 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет: > On Friday 11 of June 2010 09:24:45 Peter Volkov wrote: > > В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: > > > > I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to > > > > use a web interface? phpldapadmin or someth

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Friday 11 of June 2010 09:24:45 Peter Volkov wrote: > В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: > > > I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to > > > use a web interface? phpldapadmin or something > > > > The problem with phpldapadmin is that it potentially

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: > > I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to use a > > web interface? phpldapadmin or something > > The problem with phpldapadmin is that it potentially opens up LDAP to > the world. Require everybody to forward conn

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:58, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >> Cons: >> - developers get changes to LDAP wrong already. >>       = I counter that they ALSO change the wrong filenames and wonder why >>         there is no effect. I counted a large number of '.permissave', >>         '.devaway' and '.