Le 25/05/2010 00:17, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> so prove me wrong and post some useful feedback on the change. i'm
> simply being realistic.
Even if you think no one will ever comment on your patches, I've seen
enough projects where posting patches and doing reviews generated
interest and got peo
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 24.5.2010 23.51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. hopefully
this doesnt brea
On 24.5.2010 23.51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. hopefully
>>> this doesnt break anything else (seems to not on my system), but who knows.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. hopefully
>> this doesnt break anything else (seems to not on my system), but who knows.
>>
>> if you see random eautoreconf/eautomake
On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. hopefully
> this doesnt break anything else (seems to not on my system), but who knows.
>
> if you see random eautoreconf/eautomake failure, try backing out the
> autotools.eclass change f
