The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-05-02 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
sys-devel/binutils-nios22010-04-26 05:59:41 vapier
sys-fs/btrfs2010-04-28 15:21:09 lavajoe
xfce-extra/xfce4-volstatus-icon 2
* Stefan Behte schrieb:
> in some environments you have to rename "root" to something else, just
> to be compliant to a (maybe dumb) security policy. This might be the
> case for PCI, and as far as I remember, it is necessary (not just
> "recommended") for a BSI Grundschutz certification (meaning
hi folks,
just in case anybody's interested:
I've written a little paper on the OSS-QM project, which aims to
provide fixed sourcetrees to many packages+versions and so offload
much of the QM/patching work from individual distros to a common
place:
http://www.metux.de/download/oss-qm-project-201
* Krzysztof Pawlik schrieb:
> Interesting... to me that's not only stupid but also kinda useless - there's
> no
> difference between brute-forcing a password for user named 'foo' or 'root' -
> user name doesn't matter much. Actually according to my ssh logs attackers
> usually don't even try roo
* Alec Warner schrieb:
> Except as stated they are not fixed (as Fabian pointed out). I'm
> happy to support something like setting ROOT_UID and ROOT_GID in
> gentoo-x86 profiles and using those. Then if you want to do something
> utterly ridiculous to your system you can just set the appropria
02.05.2010 17:23, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> Interesting... to me that's not only stupid but also kinda useless - there's
> no
> difference between brute-forcing a password for user named 'foo' or 'root' -
> user name doesn't matter much.
> It's better to disable password-based remote login altoget
Peter Volkov wrote:
> ?? ??, 13/04/2010 ?? 17:18 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan ??:
> > The traditional ChangeLog that is currently employed in gentoo-x86
> > (and in other projects) is simply an ugly hack
>
> The difference between gentoo-x86 ebuild ChangeLogs and ChangeLogs used
> in other
Hi,
in some environments you have to rename "root" to something else, just
to be compliant to a (maybe dumb) security policy. This might be the
case for PCI, and as far as I remember, it is necessary (not just
"recommended") for a BSI Grundschutz certification (meaning something
like "basic securi
On 05/02/10 16:13, Stefan Behte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in some environments you have to rename "root" to something else, just
> to be compliant to a (maybe dumb) security policy. This might be the
> case for PCI, and as far as I remember, it is necessary (not just
> "recommended") for a BSI Grundschutz
