Theo Chatzimichos posted on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:35:19 +0300 as excerpted:
> The change is now committed, please test and report any problems. Thanks
[x-posted to desktop and devel, announce pruned]
I noticed the news item when I updated my netbook image yesterday. =:^)
FWIW, my workstation uses
The change is now committed, please test and report any problems. Thanks
--
Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap)
Gentoo KDE/Qt Teams
blog.tampakrap.gr
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 03/29/2010 11:47 PM, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
> So I am asking whether there would be a solution to allow people like me
> to have full bugzilla rights on packages they are in charge for.
>
Just gave you editbugs privileges, further instructions will follow per
mail/irc.
--
Regards,
Chris
abhik,
this is gentoo-dev. please take this to gentoo-soc, instead.
thanks,
sebastian
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:47:07PM +0200, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
> 1) Have an implicit restriction, i.e. give them full rights (where
> "full" just means: everything they need for handling their bugs), but
> make a policy, that they are only allowed to use this for their
> packages. In other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
currently I am a maintainer for two packages -- and as a non-gentoo-dev
being proxied by guys who are.
Now a disadvantage of this position are the restricted rights in
bugzilla. In case a bug is filed for one of my maintained packages I
have
Respected sir,
i had seen your project ideas and i am interested to wrok on
some of them like wed applications,java integration.i am an
expert advanced programming designer in java with knowledge
of c,c++ and web designing with html,ccc,php and java
script.so how can i proceed with my
On Monday 29 of March 2010 09:30:38 Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Вск, 28/03/2010 в 07:47 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет:
> > No, seriously - given the fact that some of my packages were even
> > stabilized without contacting me (app-misc/hal-cups-utils,
> > app-admin/system-config- printer-common)
>
> I
El mar, 23-03-2010 a las 21:40 +, Jeremy Olexa escribió:
> I will be moving these to maintainer-needed in a few days. I no longer use
> them and have little motivation to fix incoming bugs. Don't bother to ask,
> just feel free to change metadata.xml to yourself.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
...
> > s
René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
> Am 28.03.2010 10:30, schrieb Luis Francisco Araujo:
>> himerge
>
> Hey :P - you are a gentoo dev :P
>
> I think probably most of the app-portage category falls in here (as
> portage is the only "gentoo-specific" thing one can develop stuff for):
>
> eix, etc-propos
On 29 March 2010 09:31, Alistair Bush wrote:
> ps. I must say that its a little sad that so far there has been much more
> effort put into nitpicking than actually populating the list (working towards
> the goal).
The problem is that it isn't very clear what exactly the goal is, and what
the crit
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:31:32PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
> > > ps. I would like the packages to be specifically for gentoo, but there
> > > are exceptions to this. as an example openrc (and even paludis to a
> > > degree). If you think that there is a package not specifically
> > > target
On Sunday 28 March 2010 02:03:43 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > See this thread for background:
> > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_0673a33fe75961e510872fd2c1044ce
> > d.xml
> >
> > I think we should go through all the ssl use flag using
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:31:32PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
> I'm quite happy to consider the corner cases, and will probably include a
> vast majority of them. Initially I don't even believe I will have a fully
> complete list of all the projects the fit nicely into my criteria. Thats why
>
> diffball (the basis of y'alls delta compression for tarball
> snapshots, progenitor of tarsync used by emerge-*webrsync, etc).
>
Thank you Brian for that pkg, its appreciated. My apologies if the rest is a
little less kind.
> > ps. I would like the packages to be specifically for gentoo,
В Вск, 28/03/2010 в 07:47 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет:
> No, seriously - given the fact that some of my packages were even stabilized
> without contacting me (app-misc/hal-cups-utils, app-admin/system-config-
> printer-common)
If you know packages are broken why they were not hardmasked? If th
16 matches
Mail list logo
