Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Max Arnold
ma -xf portage-20100114.tar.lzma -C /scratch/tmp real1m3.696s user0m25.082s sys 0m12.549s $ cd /scratch/tmp/portage $ hg init --time Time: real 0.070 secs (user 0.040+0.000 sys 0.000+0.000) $ hg status --time | wc -l Time: real 9.920 secs (user 6.290+0.000 sys 1.970+0.000) 113272 $

Re: [gentoo-dev] bash version in ebuilds/eclasses...non-compliance and what to do?

2010-01-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 18:46:44 Jeremy Olexa wrote: > Exhibit A: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/python.eclass?r1=1.4 > 8&r2=1.49 > > This causes me pain on my hosts that don't have >=bash-3.1[0] for > /bin/bash. Because I can't install portage with an old bash until

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 07:07:01PM -0500, Paul Arthur wrote: > On 2010-01-14, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> i think our current work flows also significantly impede the smooth > >> running of > >> this.  if we had were using a dscm (git)

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 03:59:00AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> ChangeLog (-13,000 which would be redundant, and should be >> auto-generated alongwith metadata prior to distribution via rsync. >> Hey, this is something that needs to b

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Petteri Räty
On 01/15/2010 12:54 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > That top item is the largest blocker. The actual conversion time is down > to 9 hours, but with more than that again in setting it up. I'd like to > get the conversion time down to UNDER 4 hours. It's mostly > single-threaded, and we've got lots

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 03:59:00AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > My bad. I did the tests a while back, and the number "30,000" is > > actually for the no. of ebuilds in portage. The no. of files is > > actually ~113,000 (difference co

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:34 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > It would be nice to post that info to a webpage. That could increase a > chance of a volunteer contributing some help. > That list is incomplete, a more complete todo list can be found by looking at the archives at archives.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Daniel Bradshaw
On 01/14/2010 10:21 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Daniel Bradshaw wrote: On 01/14/2010 12:49 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: In theory, yes. In practice, git is too slow to handle 30,000 files. Even simple operations like git add become painful even if you

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > My bad. I did the tests a while back, and the number "30,000" is > actually for the no. of ebuilds in portage. The no. of files is > actually ~113,000 (difference comes because every package has a > manifest+changelog+metadata.xml+patches)

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Daniel Bradshaw wrote: > On 01/14/2010 12:49 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> >> In theory, yes. In practice, git is too slow to handle 30,000 files. >> Even simple operations like git add become painful even if you put the >> whole of portage on tmpfs since git does

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > What you need is "git update-index --assume-unchanged". That feature > was introduced exactly to reduce stat(). > > BTW, if you know you only work in certain directories, doing "git diff > --stat ", "git diff --cached --stat " instead

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Daniel Bradshaw
Excuse me butting in... I'm just a little confused. Not that this is anything new, I'm just ... well, confused. On 01/14/2010 12:49 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: In theory, yes. In practice, git is too slow to handle 30,000 files. Even simple operations like git add become painful even if you put

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 14-01-2010 a las 18:04 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió: > > It would be nice to post that info to a webpage. That could increase a > chance of a volunteer contributing some help. I agree, maybe that way other people (from forums for example) could help if they know about git (or elect

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 1/14/10 1:49 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > Besides this, there is the problem of accommodating people who use a > subtree of gentoo-x86, and those who don't want the entire CVS history > on their hard drives. In summation, robbat2 needs *our* help in the > following: > > a) Push functionality i

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Ben de Groot
2010/1/14 Markos Chandras : > My experience as developer this years implies that decisions about these > things take way too long to get implemented ( or even discussed ). So imho, > the best way to promote the proxy-maintainer thing, is individually using our > blogs or any other means. I'm not s

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Ben de Groot
2010/1/14 Nirbheek Chauhan : > In theory, yes. In practice, git is too slow to handle 30,000 files. > Even simple operations like git add become painful even if you put the > whole of portage on tmpfs since git does a stat() on every single file > in the repository with every operation. > [...] > B

Re: [gentoo-dev] Farewell, Gentoo.

2010-01-14 Thread Jesús Guerrero
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:44:31 -0800, David Shakaryan wrote: > Hello, everybody! > > I would like to formally request that I be retired from the Gentoo > project. A developer since 2006, there is a lot I would like to thank > the community for. Over the past few years, I have learnt a lot, and > ha

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-video/qdvdauthor

2010-01-14 Thread Markos Chandras
# Markos Chandras (14 Jan 2010) # Qt3 only application. bug #291878 and bug #283429 # Will be moved to kde-sunset overlay on 2010-02-14 media-video/qdvdauthor Cheers -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org signature.asc Description: This is a d

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
On 1/14/10, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i think our current work flows also significantly impede the smooth > running of > > this. if we had were using a dscm (git) on gentoo-x86, i feel like it'd > be a > > much smoother ride for Gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Markos Chandras
On Wednesday 13 January 2010 23:02:17 Ben de Groot wrote: > 2010/1/13 Mike Frysinger : > > On Tuesday 12 January 2010 15:35:45 Ben de Groot wrote: > >> 2010/1/12 Markos Chandras : > >> > If you feel like it, become a proxy-maintainer and poke a developer to > >> > put your ebuilds on tree. Have you

Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm

2010-01-14 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i think our current work flows also significantly impede the smooth running of > this.  if we had were using a dscm (git) on gentoo-x86, i feel like it'd be a > much smoother ride for Gentoo devs to pull from a proxy maintainer and push on >