Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/glibc cleanup

2009-11-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 00:36:40 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:19:11AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i plan on culling glibc versions older than 2.6.1. if you need an older > > version in the tree, now is the time to speak up. i didnt see anything > > in the profiles

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/glibc cleanup

2009-11-30 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:19:11AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i plan on culling glibc versions older than 2.6.1. if you need an older > version in the tree, now is the time to speak up. i didnt see anything in > the > profiles that would cause a problem. How is 2.4 support with 2.6.1? I'v

[gentoo-dev] sys-libs/glibc cleanup

2009-11-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
i plan on culling glibc versions older than 2.6.1. if you need an older version in the tree, now is the time to speak up. i didnt see anything in the profiles that would cause a problem. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] GPG Infrastructure for Gentoo (Was Council Meeting)

2009-11-30 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 04:18:21PM -0500, Richard Freeman wrote: > Antoni Grzymala wrote: > >How about getting back to GLEP-57 [1]? Robin Hugh Johnson made an effort > >a year ago to summarize the then-current state of things regarding tree > >and package signing, however the matter seems to have l

[gentoo-dev] Tree Integrity GLEPS for final review and council approval

2009-11-30 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:30:51PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > I reckon that missing GPG infrastructure is one of the greatest problems > of the Gentoo distribution esp. regarding serious corporate and academic > deployments. > > I can devote some time to helping with the matter. I would certa

Re: [gentoo-dev] GPG Infrastructure for Gentoo (Was Council Meeting)

2009-11-30 Thread Dawid Węgliński
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:18:21 Richard Freeman wrote: > Antoni Grzymala wrote: > > How about getting back to GLEP-57 [1]? Robin Hugh Johnson made an effort > > a year ago to summarize the then-current state of things regarding tree > > and package signing, however the matter seems to have lain

[gentoo-dev] GPG Infrastructure for Gentoo (Was Council Meeting)

2009-11-30 Thread Richard Freeman
Antoni Grzymala wrote: How about getting back to GLEP-57 [1]? Robin Hugh Johnson made an effort a year ago to summarize the then-current state of things regarding tree and package signing, however the matter seems to have lain idle and untouched for more than a year since. One concern I have w

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Add RUBY_TARGETS to USE_EXPAND

2009-11-30 Thread Alex Legler
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:28:19 +0200, Alex Legler wrote: > I would like to propose the addition of a new USE_EXPAND variable. > I have just commited the changes. -- Alex Legler | Gentoo Security / Ruby a...@gentoo.org | a...@jabber.ccc.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Next council meeting on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC

2009-11-30 Thread Thomas Sachau
Denis Dupeyron schrieb: > The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want > us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What > is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation and prefix. > You can find threads about those at: > http://archives.gent

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing eclasses

2009-11-30 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, Currently the approach is that you must mark the eclass as deprecated and wait 2 years in order to remove it. I would propose to do it more fine grained. Since portage 2.1.4.0 the environment is stored and preserved, thus eclasses are no longer required for package uninstalls (which is the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecated eclasses

2009-11-30 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 30/11/2009 05:26, Jonathan Callen a écrit : gst-plugins.eclass ACK on this one, Gilles and I have been meaning to remove it a long time ago. Thanks for cleaning it all up :) Rémi

[gentoo-dev] Last rite: dev-ruby/{nitro,og,glue,gen}

2009-11-30 Thread Alex Legler
# Alex Legler (30 Nov 2009) # Dead upstream, fetch issues with gemcutter. # Masking for removal in 30 days. dev-ruby/nitro dev-ruby/glue dev-ruby/gen dev-ruby/og -- Alex Legler | Gentoo Security / Ruby a...@gentoo.org | a...@jabber.ccc.de signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Next council meeting on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC

2009-11-30 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2009-11-30, 12:30): > Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50): > > > The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want > > us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What > > is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation

Re: [gentoo-dev] Next council meeting on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC

2009-11-30 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50): > The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want > us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What > is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation and prefix. > You can find threads about those at: > h

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for dev-scheme/kawa

2009-11-30 Thread Diego E . Pettenò
# Diego E. Pettenò (30 Nov 2009) # on behalf of QA team # # Fails to build, bug #239819 open October 2008. Solution # in overlay, as usual for lisp-team packages. # # Removal on 2010-01-29 dev-scheme/kawa