just a heads up. most packages are fixed now, so time to get wider testing.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:19:00 -0800
Brian Harring wrote:
> Someone mind explaining to me why we're making mtime preservation so
> nasty? Having to enumerate every pathway that requires mtime
> preservation is pretty arduous for the ebuild dev, meaning it's
> unlikely they'll get it right, leadi
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:01:06 +
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> I too was seeing this at a frequency that was noticeable. In the past week
> (or more), there has not been any missed emails that I have seen. Did
> something get changed to fix this issue? Or are we still guessing?
It does seem to be bette
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:09:23 -0500, Mike Frysinger
wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 November 2009 13:33:55 Christian Ruppert wrote:
>> Dear gentoo-dev subscriber,
>>
>> as some of you might have been noticed, we're having some trouble with
>> Bugzilla's mail notification.
>> In some cases you might see so
# Diego E. Pettenò (24 Nov 2009)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Fails to build, bug #227571 open since June 2008.
#
# Removal on 2010-01-23
app-forensics/airt
Brian Harring posted on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:19:00 -0800 as excerpted:
>> "Alternatively, we could simply make portage spawn the mv binary
>> whenever rename fails (it fails when the source and destination are on
>> different devices). Although it's relatively slow, it should solve the
>> problem."
