Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-19 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Some questions answered. snipped the rest. Denis Dupeyron wrote: 2009/10/18 Tomáš Chvátal : Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being run and then INTERNALY switch D->ED and other variables. If that means we can get away without touching ebuilds, apart from ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-19 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > This is a formal apology for springing that onto you. Thanks a lot. Not everybody can do such a thing as a public apology. I will nonetheless ask the council to vote on the following during next meeting: Ask Fabian to change his signatu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilisation plans for boinc 6.6.40

2009-11-19 Thread Victor Ostorga
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:50:45 +0100 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Hi guys, > I know it is not exactly common to ask for help with > pre-stabilisation testing on -dev, but i think this b*** needs more > attention than usuall package. > > Would those of you that use the package try to break it > as-much-a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/ngnus

2009-11-19 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, James Cloos wrote: > The app-emacs/ngnus- ebuild is in active use and should not go > away. It also should remain in the main tree. > (A rename to app-emacs/gnus- is OK, Done so. Thanks for the feedback. > provided it gets mentioned in profiles/updates.) It's