Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for multiple ABIs for amd64 (64bit,32bit) in multilib overlay

2009-10-18 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:26:37PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 18 October 2009 14:49:09 Thomas Sachau wrote: > > Robin H. Johnson schrieb: > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:50:23PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > >> what exactly does this "lib32" do ? naming USE flags according to > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for multiple ABIs for amd64 (64bit,32bit) in multilib overlay

2009-10-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 18 October 2009 14:49:09 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Robin H. Johnson schrieb: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:50:23PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> what exactly does this "lib32" do ? naming USE flags according to > >> specific ABI implementations is a bad idea. you have to forget specia

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2009-10-18 23h59 UTC

2009-10-18 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2009-10-18 23h59 UTC. Removals: sys-apps/minit 2009-10-12 15:39:42 vostorga kde-base/artsplugin-mpeglib 2009-10-12 23:27:53 abcd kde-base/artsplugin-mpg123 20

[gentoo-dev] Re: openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-18 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Tomáš Chvátal : > Actualy i would like to hear what we in KDE did too, we publish into > the tree as 0 days bump mostly since 4.2 and 4.1 was in the tree > right away when we had working configuration. Your bumping is excellent, no discussion here. Gnome does a really good job in figuring ou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for multiple ABIs for amd64 (64bit,32bit) in multilib overlay

2009-10-18 Thread Thomas Sachau
Robin H. Johnson schrieb: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:50:23PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> what exactly does this "lib32" do ? naming USE flags according to specific >> ABI implementations is a bad idea. you have to forget special casing >> anything >> to "lib32 vs lib64". amd64, while th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for multiple ABIs for amd64 (64bit,32bit) in multilib overlay

2009-10-18 Thread Thomas Sachau
Mike Frysinger schrieb: > > another quick look at _setup_abi_env() looks like it needs work: > - LD should not default to `ld` Whats your suggestion? > - the -L paths to system dirs in LDFLAGS should not be there -- the > toolchain > can handle these just fine Last time i tried without, so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-10-18 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 18-10-2009 13:57:10 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Hi, > You know i am totaly supporting prefix but i have one point. > Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being > run > and then INTERNALY switch D->ED and other variables. It would be much easier > that way to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-10-18 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, You know i am totaly supporting prefix but i have one point. Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being run and then INTERNALY switch D->ED and other variables. It would be much easier that way to migrate all stuff in portage instead of doing this || shebang.

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-10-18 Thread Fabian Groffen
Recently, Prefix changes have been committed to the gentoo-x86 tree, it was rather ambitious on my part, where I moved stuff that we are not maintainer of ourself. It should have been communicated better for these ebuilds. This is a formal apology for springing that onto you. This will attempt to