Hello,
See attached news item for consideration.
Suggestions on how to improve it, including the text section, very
welcome.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
Title: Upgrade to GNOME 2.26
Author: Gentoo Gnome Team
Content-T
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:49:54 -0500
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Now, with this email I fully expect a reply from /someone/ saying
> that "the Gentoo Prefix implementation is just plain wrong" to which,
> I am going to silently ignore.
No, everyone already knows what you're doing wrong, yourself included,
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Now, with this email I
> fully expect a reply from /someone/ saying that "the Gentoo Prefix
> implementation is just plain wrong" to which, I am going to silently
> ignore.
Good plan. As they say, don't feed the trolls. No matter how highly
ev
2009/10/5 Tomáš Chvátal :
> Dne pondělí 05 Říjen 2009 23:31:03 Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
>> Jeremy Olexa (darkside) wrote:
>> > darkside 09/10/05 21:22:30
>> >
>> > Modified: ChangeLog xfconf-4.6.1.ebuild
>> > Log:
>> > Port Gentoo Prefix ebuild to gentoo-x86
>> > (Portage v
Dne pondělí 05 Říjen 2009 23:31:03 Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
> Jeremy Olexa (darkside) wrote:
> > darkside09/10/05 21:22:30
> >
> > Modified: ChangeLog xfconf-4.6.1.ebuild
> > Log:
> > Port Gentoo Prefix ebuild to gentoo-x86
> > (Portage version: 2.1.6.13/cvs/Linux x86_64)
Jeremy Olexa (darkside) wrote:
> darkside09/10/05 21:22:30
>
> Modified: ChangeLog xfconf-4.6.1.ebuild
> Log:
> Port Gentoo Prefix ebuild to gentoo-x86
> (Portage version: 2.1.6.13/cvs/Linux x86_64)
> + # Prefix compat. In Gentoo Linux, defaults to ${D}
> +
On 05-10-2009 16:32:58 -0400, Jonathan Callen wrote:
> Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> > The problem here IMO is that this wrapper executes python2.6 with argv0 set
> > to python2.6, while it should be the argv0 from how the wrapper was
> > executed.
> > At least this is what init.d scripts expect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> The problem here IMO is that this wrapper executes python2.6 with argv0 set
> to python2.6, while it should be the argv0 from how the wrapper was executed.
> At least this is what init.d scripts expect (seen with ntlmaps
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2009-10-04 20:32:17 Hanno Böck napisał(a):
>> I just stepped over a problem with the new python-wrapper. If I interpreted
>> the changelogs correctly, since eselect-python-20090801 /usr/bin/python is
>> no
>> longer a symlink, but a wrapper.
>
> Sin
