Hello again!
Just a few quick updates. By now the server side accepts
Gentoo-specific data from the client (transfered as JSON) and updates
that machine's previous submission in the database. (That's not as
trivial as it may sound at first.) As a single submission produces a
few thousand INSER
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>>> This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end quiz.
>>>
>> Ebuild quiz:
>>
>> 19. What is the procedure for removing packages from the tree?
>>
>
> Looking back, my answe
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>> This seems like something that should be added to the ebuild/end quiz.
>>
>
> Ebuild quiz:
>
> 19. What is the procedure for removing packages from the tree?
>
Looking back, my answer to that question was insufficient
Hello all,
Once again, another productive week. This week's work focused mostly on
profiles. Uprofile's implementation exceeded my expectations and was
much easier than what I thought it would be, the reason: uselect's
simple api.
What's working on uprofile:
* uprofile when called with no argume
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:26:09 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree.
>
> It's been in use for a long time in xfce's ebuilds already, noone has
> ever complained. One can easily match some hundreds of ebuilds in tree
> where it's used.
Yes, unfortun
On 01-08-2009 21:26:09 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300
> > Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
> >
> >>2) EXPF+=" src_configure" ;;
> >
> > += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use i
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
>
>> 2) EXPF+=" src_configure" ;;
>
> += is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree.
>
It's been in use for a long time in xfce's ebuilds
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:28:44 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> I would like to present the plan of support for multiple ABIs. It
> should be sufficient for Python modules and might be also appropriate
> for some other ABI types (e.g. for Ruby modules).
How do you plan to handle t
AllenJB wrote:
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>> We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the
>> time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also,
>> there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the
>> time is right to start working on a
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis wrote:
> 2009-07-26 14:40:13 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) napisał(a):
>> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>> > I would like to present the plan of support for multiple ABIs. It should
>> > be sufficient for
>> > Python modul
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:58:10 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
> 2) EXPF+=" src_configure" ;;
+= is bash 3.1, which isn't legal for use in the tree.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Please comment if there's something to change. Keep it simple.
Improved version attached. EAPI checking modification.
Thanks, Samuli
# Copyright 1999-2009 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $
# @ECLASS: xfconf
Right now, xfce ebuilds in tree are unmaintainable because:
- Eclass sets invalid license to pkgs, they all have different ones,
GPL-2, LGPL-2*, GPL-3, BSD
- Ebuilds have started using internal functions from both xfce44 and
xfce4 eclasses. Yes, some Xfce 4.6 ebuilds are still using xfce44.eclass
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs
>> like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a
>> package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matchin
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
I would love to see the GLEP on CPE names in metadata.xml discussed,
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.
Hi,
It has been quite some time sinse I've found time to be on an Internet
connection to post, so:
I'm just posting to find out how discussions on adding
app-accessibility/speakup, etc, to Gentoo release media is going, and
to find out if the Gentoo release team has plans for including this
for bli
Ben de Groot wrote:
> We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the
> time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also,
> there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the
> time is right to start working on a new set of profiles.
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs
> like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a
> package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matching
> entries and remove them t
We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the
time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also,
there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the
time is right to start working on a new set of profiles.
One reason I bring this up
It was about 7 months since these was deprecated, and there was no
pparent upgrade path issues. They are now gone.
Thanks, Samuli
21 matches
Mail list logo
