[gentoo-dev] last-rite notice format [WAS: [gentoo-dev-announce] QA last rite for net-misc/ltsp]

2009-06-20 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:08:24AM +0200, Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > The package is already masked for security reasons (bug #215699), and > also has big problems with our QA point of view included a huge FILESDIR > (bug #274882). > > Since the package has been masked since 2008/04/01,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-06-21

2009-06-20 Thread Robin H. Johnson
This isn't meant to shoot stuff down, but more to suggest other places that filtering is probably going to be needed, based on some "advanced" [1] usage of Gentoo. On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 03:26:56AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > What do I mean by auto-filtering? Auto-filtering works to protec

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-06-21

2009-06-20 Thread Sebastian Pipping
I've been working on the first Gentoo-specific data collecting bytes today. As smolt is written in Python using Portage's Python API was an easy choice. Here's an excerpt of data sets and their status of processing that I've been working with today: Collected and auto-filtered: - gentoo_o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > it was brought up by ulm that the news item > '2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it > contains a dot. I stumbled upon this when I experimented with news to e-mail forwarding, where there are some limitations for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Petteri Räty
Dale wrote: > Zac Medico wrote: >> Vlastimil Babka wrote: >>> The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, >>> and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. >> AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs -> >> rsync script will ensure that the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Dale
Zac Medico wrote: > Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, > > and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. > > AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs -> > rsync script will ensure that the incorrectly nam

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Overlays and Metadata Cache

2009-06-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:40:17 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Have you thought about the security implications of this? > Yes. > > > How much do you trust the people running the overlays listed in > > layman? > > VirtualBox. And how do you use VirtualBox to prevent one malicious person from runnin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vlastimil Babka wrote: > The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, > and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs -> rsync script will ensure that t

[gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Hi, it was brought up by ulm that the news item '2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it contains a dot. As it was me who named and commited it, I am sorry for this mistake. The file name in -dev review mail was called 'generation1-deprecation' and I probably shoul

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Overlays and Metadata Cache

2009-06-20 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Saturday 20 June 2009 20:22:22 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:46:33 +0200 > > Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Generating the metadata cache isn't that expensive - it took about 45 > > minutes to initially check out almost everything layman provided and > > then about an hour for the f

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Overlays and Metadata Cache

2009-06-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:46:33 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > Generating the metadata cache isn't that expensive - it took about 45 > minutes to initially check out almost everything layman provided and > then about an hour for the first run. Consecutive runs should be much > faster and can be run in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Overlays and Metadata Cache

2009-06-20 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Lauer wrote: > The only issue I have found with this idea relates to eclasses - overriding > in-tree eclasses to be precise. The problem there is that it invalidates in- > tree metadata and potentially affects other overlays too. So that's a b

Re: [packagekit] [gentoo-dev] Inviting you to project "PackageMap"

2009-06-20 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Petteri Räty wrote: > You need to come up with the needed DTD changes for metadata.xml. Last > time the schema was changed it was done with a GLEP so writing one seems > prudent here too especially if we are going to make the value mandatory > after it was been added to all existing packages. Also

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Overlays and Metadata Cache

2009-06-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
Just a FYI On 20-06-2009 18:46:33 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: > If I don't get distracted I might set up a proof of concept public > rsync server providing the main repo plus all overlays I can throw in, > but it'd have a low initial update frequency (6h to daily). Note that the Prefix rsync tree

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Overlays and Metadata Cache

2009-06-20 Thread Patrick Lauer
Hello everybody, those of us using overlays might have noticed that they can seriously slow down dependency calculation. This is mostly because of the lack of a metadata cache. For overlay maintainers providing a metadata cache is quite tricky because to be really consistent and useful it'd hav

Re: [packagekit] [gentoo-dev] Inviting you to project "PackageMap"

2009-06-20 Thread Petteri Räty
Sebastian Pipping wrote: > I start to understand the real benefits of moving a larger > part of the maintenance down to the distro level as you proposed. > > Okay, let's add support for CPEs at distro package level > and sync up and down with the central packagemap database. > Please contact me fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Council meeting summary for meeting on June 11, 2009

2009-06-20 Thread Petteri Räty
Denis Dupeyron wrote: >> probably belongs in -project. > > Not even in -project, it simply wasn't public mailing-list material. > For those who haven't understood yet, the -dev and -project mailing > lists are not for keeping us informed of your random thought of the > day or lamenting about > why