[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] net-misc/l7-filter removal

2009-06-16 Thread Peter Volkov
This package is hard masked now finally. Another reference to count: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274341 В Втр, 28/04/2009 в 17:24 +1000, Daniel Black пишет: > This package relies on disabling of essential package management features > (collision-protection) to achieve installation. It

Re: [packagekit] [gentoo-dev] Inviting you to project "PackageMap"

2009-06-16 Thread Sebastian Pipping
I start to understand the real benefits of moving a larger part of the maintenance down to the distro level as you proposed. Okay, let's add support for CPEs at distro package level and sync up and down with the central packagemap database. Please contact me for collaboration on sync scripts and "

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review a new (unofficial) eclass

2009-06-16 Thread Nick
Quoth Ciaran McCreesh: > You *really* shouldn't be messing around with things in DISTDIR the way > you are. That's just plain horrible. The only reason DISTDIR isn't > forcibly read-only is that the scm eclasses need to write to > subdirectories of it. > > Just do your own unpack if you can't hand

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review a new (unofficial) eclass

2009-06-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:06:02 +0100 Nick wrote: > Please can you let me know what you think of the eclass & ebuilds; > any suggestions, criticisms, questions etc? This is my first time > writing an eclass, and to me it all feels quite nice and solid, but > that's the sort of thing which could qu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Review a new (unofficial) eclass

2009-06-16 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne úterý 16 Červen 2009 18:34:46 Christian Faulhammer napsal(a): > You could make it EAPI 2 safe and use the src_prepare function for all > your tarball magic. See other eclasses that handle EAPI case switching. Specialy x-modular, git or cmake-utils It has most readable output, when we get to m

[gentoo-dev] Re: Review a new (unofficial) eclass

2009-06-16 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Nick : > Please can you let me know what you think of the eclass & ebuilds; > any suggestions, criticisms, questions etc? This is my first time > writing an eclass, and to me it all feels quite nice and solid, but > that's the sort of thing which could quickly and harshly disproved > ;-)

[gentoo-dev] Progress on Universal Select Tool

2009-06-16 Thread Sérgio Almeida
Hello, Current State of Universal Select Tool - uselect Proposal link: http://socghop.appspot.com/student_project/show/google/gsoc2009/gentoo/t124022356237 uselect implementation started a few weeks before SoC officially started to "de-rust" myself on python programming. Here follows a checkl

[gentoo-dev] Review a new (unofficial) eclass

2009-06-16 Thread Nick
Hi there, I've been working on an eclass and associated ebuilds for the linux-libre [1] kernels. It's just linux with bits which they consider unfree are removed. It's a project of FSFLA. The reason I chose to do most of the work in an eclass rather than the ebuild is so I can very easily take

[gentoo-dev] KDE Team meeting, June 2009

2009-06-16 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, yay this time i forgot to sent the mail sooner, hope you won't be angry on me. Important info: Where: #gentoo-kde @ freenode.net When: 18.6.2009 19:00 UTC This time topics: - Solving the final question about kdeprefix. - KDE 4 Stabilisation. - handle the PyQt3 qscintilla dependencies - Progres