Hello everyone,
dev-python/pycrash and dev-python/glewpy are either dead or
unmaintained so im masking them for removal in 30 days. There are some
non-fixable bugs regarding this packages. (see bug #198330 for glewpy
and #221267 for pycrash)
Best regards,
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 09:47:24PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Maybe I am being misunderstood. I'm all for it even if it does make it
> bigger. It's a good idea in my opinion.
Hi Dale,
no, I didn't misunderstand you, and I am sorry if I came across tha
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:12:17PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> > Ferris McCormick wrote:
> >> If the 20MB is a real problem, I think the alternative is to have two
> >> versions of the "minimal CD". Otherwise it seems to me that Gentoo is
> >> discriminating against people who cann
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:32:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> >>
> > For a person on dial-up, about 2 1/2 hours of additional download. That
> > said, I'd be OK with the increase in size if it would help a person who
> > can't see the screen.
>
> It is impossible for a person
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:12:17PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Ferris McCormick wrote:
> >
> > If the 20MB is a real problem, I think the alternative is to have two
> > versions of the "minimal CD". Otherwise it seems to me that Gentoo is
> > discriminating
On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:12:17 -0500
Dale wrote:
> Ferris McCormick wrote:
> >
> > If the 20MB is a real problem, I think the alternative is to have two
> > versions of the "minimal CD". Otherwise it seems to me that Gentoo is
> > discriminating against people who cannot see the screen, and I woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:32:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Thomas Pani wrote:
> > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> >
> >> The real issue here is the size. If these additional packages plus all of
> >> the alsa modules add 20MB
Ferris McCormick wrote:
>
> If the 20MB is a real problem, I think the alternative is to have two
> versions of the "minimal CD". Otherwise it seems to me that Gentoo is
> discriminating against people who cannot see the screen, and I would
> consider that to be very tacky at best.
>
> Someone (rd
On Sat, 23 May 2009 18:14:57 -0500
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> On 05/23/2009 05:56 PM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> My question for the group is, how do you feel about speech software
> >> being on our minimal cd as well as our live cd?
> > I agree, it should be in
Thomas Pani wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
>
>> The real issue here is the size. If these additional packages plus all of
>> the alsa modules add 20MB to the minimal CD, it's just not worth it. It's
>> not "minimal" anymore.
>>
>>
> Could you elaborate whom
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> The real issue here is the size. If these additional packages plus all of
> the alsa modules add 20MB to the minimal CD, it's just not worth it. It's
> not "minimal" anymore.
>
Could you elaborate whom that change would affect (negatively)?
On 05/23/2009 05:56 PM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
William Hubbs wrote:
[snip]
My question for the group is, how do you feel about speech software
being on our minimal cd as well as our live cd?
I agree, it should be in our minimal and live CD's. There is no reason
to consider blind persons out of t
William Hubbs wrote:
> [snip]
> My question for the group is, how do you feel about speech software
> being on our minimal cd as well as our live cd?
I agree, it should be in our minimal and live CD's. There is no reason
to consider blind persons out of the minimal CD.
Mounir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Marples wrote:
> Attached is the new conf.d/net sample.
Sorry, I missed those. Did lists.g.o remove them, or were they not
attached?
> As such, a side project I've started is a new ifconfig tool
> [1] to handle everything from vlans, to bridging
Roy Marples wrote:
> One side effect of this is that daemons such was wpa_supplicant and PPP
> are now init scripts proper - this is good. The only downside is that
> you lose the ability to control each interface via init.d. Instead I
> propose you control this via ifconfig.
Uh, so in summary any
Alin Năstac wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> The only reason why OpenRC has not come up for stabilization by it's
>> maintainers is the fact that everytime there's a new version readied
>> for release, on the horizon there's new incompatible changes being
>> planned for the next version. The OpenR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Everybody,
Last week I stepped down from the vmware herd, and since I was the only
member left, there are no more maintainers for the vmware packages in
the tree. The current packages are vmware-workstation, vmware-server,
vmware-player, vmware-mo
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> The only reason why OpenRC has not come up for stabilization by it's
> maintainers is the fact that everytime there's a new version readied
> for release, on the horizon there's new incompatible changes being
> planned for the next version. The OpenRC maintainers in Gentoo h
On Saturday 23 of May 2009 10:53:49 Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 22 May 2009, Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> > Haven't tested it yet on my box, but i'd like to know if openrc
> > handles 801.2Q support.
>
> Near as I can tell, it does (some lines shortened for brevity):
>
> [r...@sareth ~]#
Hi!
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> Haven't tested it yet on my box, but i'd like to know if openrc
> handles 801.2Q support.
Near as I can tell, it does (some lines shortened for brevity):
[r...@sareth ~]# eix -Ic openrc
[I] sys-apps/openrc (0.4.3...@05/15/2009): OpenRC manages t
20 matches
Mail list logo
