On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:44:27 +0300
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Masked this a couple weeks ago but forgot to announce it:
> >
> > - old old old docs for the AFS file system, which get installed with
> > net-fs/openafs USE=doc anyways
> > - not touched since 2005
> > - unmaintained
On Wed, May 20, 2009 19:12, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 18:43, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>
>>> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hello,
This is a request for comments on a new project,
namely "Gentoo Support Everywhere".
>
On Wed, May 20, 2009 22:58, AllenJB wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> This is a request for comments on a new project,
>> namely "Gentoo Support Everywhere".
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gse/
>>
>>
>> The web page doesn't really explain all the background
>> needed to unde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale schrieb:
> As for people knowing about Gentoo and the forums, go to google and type
> in Gentoo. First hit, Gentoo home page. Even includes links to the
> docs and other pages that are handy.
Allow me a short remark: Enter "gentoo forum" - and
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
Hello,
This is a request for comments on a new project,
namely "Gentoo Support Everywhere".
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gse/
The web page doesn't really explain all the background
needed to understand why would anyone want to start such
a project. However this forum thr
On Wed, May 20, 2009 22:26, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>> Alistair Bush wrote:
>>
>>> Dale wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
> The Gentoo subforum on LQ would help to collect the posts in one
> place.
>
>
That would be the point. Â Gentoo has its ow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009.05.20 12:26, Dale wrote:
[snip]
>
> But does Gentoo support those forums? My point is, the people here,
> devs in particular, have enough to do already. Why add one more
> thing
> for them to deal with?
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
Dale,
I
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Dale wrote:
> Alistair Bush wrote:
>> Dale wrote:
>>
>>
The Gentoo subforum on LQ would help to collect the posts in one place.
>>> That would be the point. Gentoo has its own forum so why have two
>>> forums? What would be the point in having two
Alistair Bush wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
>
>>> The Gentoo subforum on LQ would help to collect the posts in one place.
>>>
>>>
>> That would be the point. Gentoo has its own forum so why have two
>> forums? What would be the point in having two places to go look for
>> answers? Better yet,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 21:18, Josh Saddler wrote:
> However, for the purposes of an actual project, I believe it's
> considered essential that we own the infrastructure that project is hosted
> on. All of our other projects (to my knowledge) are hosted on our own
> infrastructure.
>
> If we cannot p
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Josh Saddler wrote:
>> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>>> I hope it goes without saying that bug 213988
>>> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/213988) should be resolved before either
>>> stabilization or news posting. The doc is s
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Josh Saddler wrote:
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> I hope it goes without saying that bug 213988
>> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/213988) should be resolved before either
>> stabilization or news posting. The doc is somewhat out of date now.
>
> I assume you mean the baselayou
Dale wrote:
>> The Gentoo subforum on LQ would help to collect the posts in one place.
>>
>
> That would be the point. Gentoo has its own forum so why have two
> forums? What would be the point in having two places to go look for
> answers? Better yet, why would Gentoo support both forums?
>
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a request for comments on a new project,
> namely "Gentoo Support Everywhere".
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gse/
>
> The web page doesn't really explain all the background
> needed to understand why would anyone want to start such
> a project. Howe
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> I hope it goes without saying that bug 213988
> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/213988) should be resolved before either
> stabilization or news posting. The doc is somewhat out of date now.
I assume you mean the baselayout-2/openrc migration guide?
Not as far as we know. And what w
On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:12:56 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> This error occurs only when there is no up-to-date cache for given
> ebuild. rsync users would see only the usual "masked by: EAPI 3"
> message.
We always have to assume that there might not be an up to date cache.
Th
2009-05-20 19:29:12 Piotr Jaroszyński napisał(a):
> 2009/5/20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis :
> > 2009-05-17 19:02:02 Piotr Jaroszyński napisał(a):
> >> 2009/5/17 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis :
> >> > 2009-05-17 18:37:32 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
> >> >> On Sun, 17 May 2009 18:20:21
090520 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> A lot has changed from Baselayout version 1.x to 2.0.0, so all users
>> should take a look at the upgrade guide found at
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml
>> to not break their systems. You will likely see an update of
>> sys-apps/baselayout in t
2009/5/20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis :
> 2009-05-17 19:02:02 Piotr Jaroszyński napisał(a):
>> 2009/5/17 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis :
>> > 2009-05-17 18:37:32 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
>> >> On Sun, 17 May 2009 18:20:21 +0200
>> >> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>> >
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 18:43, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> This is a request for comments on a new project,
>>> namely "Gentoo Support Everywhere".
>>>
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gse/
>>>
>>>
>> New projects must be announced
2009-05-17 19:02:02 Piotr Jaroszyński napisał(a):
> 2009/5/17 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis :
> > 2009-05-17 18:37:32 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
> >> On Sun, 17 May 2009 18:20:21 +0200
> >> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> >> > I would like to suggest to include possibility of u
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is no set date, but I want to post a GLEP 42 news item before the
> actual stabilisation. Maybe other channels like the web page can carry
> that news then, too. Please comment the attached news item.
> Vapier wanted
On Wed, May 20, 2009 18:43, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> This is a request for comments on a new project,
>> namely "Gentoo Support Everywhere".
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gse/
>>
>>
>
> New projects must be announced via gentoo-dev-announce and I hav
> A lot has changed from Baselayout version 1.x to 2.0.0, so all users
> should take a look at the upgrade guide found at
>
>http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml
>
> to not break their systems. You will likely see an update of
> sys-apps/baselayout in the near future: After
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is no set date, but I want to post a GLEP 42 news item before the
> actual stabilisation. Maybe other channels like the web page can carry
> that news then, too. Please comment the attached news item.
> Vapier wanted to know, if it is possible that th
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Masked this a couple weeks ago but forgot to announce it:
>
> - old old old docs for the AFS file system, which get installed with
> net-fs/openafs USE=doc anyways
> - not touched since 2005
> - unmaintained
>
>
Was this posted to -dev-announce as I see nothing there?
Regard
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a request for comments on a new project,
> namely "Gentoo Support Everywhere".
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gse/
>
New projects must be announced via gentoo-dev-announce and I haven't see
a mail although project pages exist. Also I don't see how t
Hi,
Jesús Guerrero :
> I really don't care if this is a top level project or a subproject.
> So, what do people think about this?
It is a good idea to reach out to our users. So yes.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeN
Hi,
there is no set date, but I want to post a GLEP 42 news item before the
actual stabilisation. Maybe other channels like the web page can carry
that news then, too. Please comment the attached news item.
Vapier wanted to know, if it is possible that the news item is
displayed user has (a) Ba
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
The maintainer-wanted team owns that foo package then, which is why
having a different mail alias than the existing one for "new package
requests that aren't in gentoo tree yet" would be a good idea.
Ok, I think I see where you're coming from. Essentially
maintainer-wan
On Wed, May 20, 2009 14:44, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
>> Comments welcome, and thanks for reading.
>>
>
> (replying to random)
>
>
> Look, there has been a whopping 6 developer comments on this thread -
> none of them opposed. This means to me that you should continue on with
> your plan. You are alre
Comments welcome, and thanks for reading.
(replying to random)
Look, there has been a whopping 6 developer comments on this thread -
none of them opposed. This means to me that you should continue on with
your plan. You are already a moderator of our forums, so get someone
with cvs access
On Wed, May 20, 2009 13:26, Dale wrote:
>
> But does Gentoo support those forums? My point is, the people here,
> devs in particular, have enough to do already. Why add one more thing for
> them to deal with?
Devs don't have to bother or even know about this at all.
The support will be limited
On Wednesday 20 May 2009 14:24:11 Dale wrote:
> Since I am seeing this from a user perspective, my opinion stands. I'm
> not against them having a forum where ever people choose, I just don't
> think Gentoo and devs should be required to support it. They have
> enough to deal with now.
>
I ve alw
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 05:33, Dale wrote:
>
>> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>>
>> I don't see how doing double the work will benefit anyone. Its a lot
>> easier to have one forum than it is to have two forums. I just think the
>> Gentoo folks would be better to concentrate on wh
Nandeep Mali wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Dale wrote:
> [...]
>
>> I'm a member at LQ tho I haven't been there in a long while. I just
>> don't see why there has to be two forums when the one forum we have is
>> more than enough. If someone can't find the Gentoo forums, I'm not s
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Dale wrote:
[...]
> I'm a member at LQ tho I haven't been there in a long while. I just
> don't see why there has to be two forums when the one forum we have is
> more than enough. If someone can't find the Gentoo forums, I'm not sure
> they can find the chair an
On Wed, May 20, 2009 05:33, Dale wrote:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
> I don't see how doing double the work will benefit anyone. Its a lot
> easier to have one forum than it is to have two forums. I just think the
> Gentoo folks would be better to concentrate on what we have than to
> be spreading
On Wed, May 20, 2009 06:23, Dale wrote:
>
> I still get this:
>
>
> "The topic or post you requested does not exist". I am logged in.
An administrator moved it back while I was asleep. I shouldn't
have moved anything outside the mod forum without asking first.
However all the reasoning has alr
On Wed, May 20, 2009 02:18, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 01:10 +0200, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 00:37, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> That would be the point. Gentoo has its own forum so why have two
>>> forums? What would be the point in having two places to go look fo
On Wed, May 20, 2009 01:18, Duncan wrote:
> "Robin H. Johnson" posted
> robbat2.20090519t230236.2687450...@orbis-terrarum.net, excerpted below, on
> Tue, 19 May 2009 16:03:29 -0700:
>
>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:00:34AM +0200, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>>
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-
41 matches
Mail list logo
