On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Olivier Huber wrote:
[snip]
> dirtyepic made a funny entry on his blog [1] and darkside tried also
> to do something [2], but it seems to me that this alias is a black
[snip]
You forgot the references :)
Don't postpone putting them till the end! You *will* forget
2009/5/4 Sérgio Almeida :
> Please drop me a line here or at freenode if you have anything to add
All I have to add is thanks a lot. I wished other SoC students would
also introduce themselves and their project on their list.
Denis.
Hi,
2009/5/4 Thomas Sachau
>[snip]
> For those, who can work with IRC and are interested in working with ebuilds,
> there is already an option:
>
> Join #gentoo-dev-help or even better #gentoo-sunrise and read the
> documentation from the topic. The
> Sunrise Overlay (with the #gentoo-sunrise I
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
George Prowse wrote:
I think you are missing the point. If you sit and wait for them to
join you will always be understaffed.
Go on a big dev drive! Announce it all over all the Gentoo's normal
communication channels and other generic linux places! Email some
linux magazin
George Prowse wrote:
> I think you are missing the point. If you sit and wait for them to
> join you will always be understaffed.
>
> Go on a big dev drive! Announce it all over all the Gentoo's normal
> communication channels and other generic linux places! Email some
> linux magazines, talk to di
Gentoo Dev's,
My name is Sérgio Almeida, I am Portuguese and I am a student for this
year's Google SoC coding the Universal Select Tool project for Gentoo
being Sébastien Fabbro (bicatali) my mentor.
Abstract:
Universal Select Tool is an utility to manage system configuration.
This tool is simil
On Monday 04 May 2009 23:47:08 George Prowse wrote:
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
> > Mario Fetka schrieb:
> >> On Monday, 4. May 2009 19:06:12 George Prowse wrote:
> >>> Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks,
> welp
> >>>
> >>> Sad to hear it mate.
> >>>
> >>> As the person
Thomas Sachau wrote:
Mario Fetka schrieb:
On Monday, 4. May 2009 19:06:12 George Prowse wrote:
Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
Hi
Thanks,
welp
Sad to hear it mate.
As the person who did your first install for you (i think) I think you
will be missed.
I am quite surprised about what you sai
Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 07:50 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
> On 08:34 Mon 04 May , Thomas Anderson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 02:06:47PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> > > Isn't it second and fourth Thursday?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Petteri
> > >
> >
> > That's an oversimplifi
Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 15:35 +0300 schrieb Markos Chandras:
> On Monday 04 May 2009 14:50:56 Ferris McCormick wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 May 2009 04:34:20 -0400
> [..]
> > I've been a developer a bit over 5 years. We know the problems and are
> > working to fix them.
> >
> I am sure that you know th
Mario Fetka schrieb:
> On Monday, 4. May 2009 19:06:12 George Prowse wrote:
>> Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> welp
>> Sad to hear it mate.
>>
>> As the person who did your first install for you (i think) I think you
>> will be missed.
>>
>> I am quite surprised about wha
On Monday 04 May 2009 20:06:12 George Prowse wrote:
> Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thanks,
> > welp
>
> Sad to hear it mate.
>
> As the person who did your first install for you (i think) I think you
> will be missed.
>
> I am quite surprised about what you said about the state of
On Monday 04 May 2009 21:24:11 Richard Freeman wrote:
> Markos Chandras wrote:
> > I am sure that you know them. But those problems are the reasons why more
> > and more developers are demotivated and leaving Gentoo. 'Fixing' those
> > problems should be a N1 priority on every gentoo council meetin
Arun Raghavan wrote:
As for the songs, does it make sense to put that in a separate package
that the code package depends on? The package can have the restrictive
license it is distributed under and RESTRICT="mirror bindist".
That was my first thought as well - just split out the songs and
r
Markos Chandras wrote:
I am sure that you know them. But those problems are the reasons why more and
more developers are demotivated and leaving Gentoo. 'Fixing' those problems
should be a N1 priority on every gentoo council meeting until they are gone.
There is absolutely no point in trying to
On Monday, 4. May 2009 19:06:12 George Prowse wrote:
> Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thanks,
> > welp
>
> Sad to hear it mate.
>
> As the person who did your first install for you (i think) I think you
> will be missed.
>
> I am quite surprised about what you said about the state o
On Monday, 4. May 2009 19:06:12 George Prowse wrote:
> Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thanks,
> > welp
>
> Sad to hear it mate.
>
> As the person who did your first install for you (i think) I think you
> will be missed.
>
> I am quite surprised about what you said about the state o
Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
Hi
Thanks,
welp
Sad to hear it mate.
As the person who did your first install for you (i think) I think you
will be missed.
I am quite surprised about what you said about the state of things
because i've got the distinct impression from others that Gentoo h
On Mon, 4 May 2009 19:36:04 +0300
Markos Chandras wrote:
> > Or pushing more and more EAPI's will?
>
> No... As I said before Gentoo is quite understaffed. First we need
> people. Then we can concentrate on features :)
As it happens, a lot of the features that go into EAPIs are designed to
help w
On Monday 04 May 2009 18:54:09 Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
> > On a more serious note, the problem seems to be the complete lack of
> > management in the required places, Gentoo is fast becoming (or more
> > likely, already is) an anarchic organisation, where it's becoming
Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
On a more serious note, the problem seems to be the complete lack of
management in the required places, Gentoo is fast becoming (or more
likely, already is) an anarchic organisation, where it's becoming
nigh-on impossible to keep track of things.
I see a number of i
On 08:34 Mon 04 May , Thomas Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 02:06:47PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> > Isn't it second and fourth Thursday?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Petteri
> >
>
> That's an oversimplification. That varies because of when we have some
> holidays and skip meetings, thr
> S="${WORKDIR}/${P}"
You don't need to set this, it's the default.
> filter-flags '-fomit-frame-pointer'
filter-flags in global scope? You should put that in
src_unpack/src_prepare.
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009.05.04 10:20, Tiziano Müller wrote:
[snip]
>
> We usually have the meeting every two weeks, so the next meeting
> would
> be the next Thursday. Unless someone has objections I'd propose to
> hold
> the meeting then.
> I guess I have to change
Ferris McCormick posted
20090504114734.30329...@anaconda.krait.us, excerpted below, on Mon, 04
May 2009 11:47:34 +:
> For what it's worth (probably not much) I think Foundation is
> functioning now. At least, we are legal again, have bylaws, and a real
> bank account.
I should have stated
On Monday 04 May 2009 14:50:56 Ferris McCormick wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 2009 04:34:20 -0400
[..]
> I've been a developer a bit over 5 years. We know the problems and are
> working to fix them.
>
I am sure that you know them. But those problems are the reasons why more and
more developers are demot
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 02:06:47PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> Isn't it second and fourth Thursday?
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
That's an oversimplification. That varies because of when we have some
holidays and skip meetings, throughing the schedule off. It's easiest to
remember it as every othe
On Mon, 4 May 2009 04:34:20 -0400
Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Monday 04 May 2009 00:26:13 Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've enjoyed my time with Gentoo, mostly... But these days I've just got
> > too demotivated to work on it. I might have stayed if Ken69267 posted me
> > some Life
On Sun, 3 May 2009 18:51:59 -0400
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Peter Faraday Weller posted
> 1241385973.4028.67.ca...@localhost.localdomain, excerpted below, on Sun,
> 03 May 2009 22:26:13 +0100:
>
> > On a more serious note, the problem seems to be the complete lack of
> > management
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 11:34 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Monday 04 May 2009 00:26:13 Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've enjoyed my time with Gentoo, mostly... But these days I've just got
> > too demotivated to work on it. I might have stayed if Ken69267 posted me
> > some Lifes
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 00:25 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 2009.05.03 22:47, Tiziano Müller wrote:
>>> This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd &
>>> 4th
>>> Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> GnuTLS >=2.7.1 doesn't contain 'libgnutls-config' and 'libgnutls-extra-config'
> scripts so packages, which use them, usually fail to build.
> (Sometimes `configure` scripts disable support for GnuTLS without failing.)
>
> The list of packages depending
On Monday 04 May 2009 00:26:13 Peter Faraday Weller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've enjoyed my time with Gentoo, mostly... But these days I've just got
> too demotivated to work on it. I might have stayed if Ken69267 posted me
> some Lifesavers, but he didn't. :(
>
> On a more serious note, the problem seems
Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 00:25 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2009.05.03 22:47, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd &
> > 4th
> > Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#ge
Peter Faraday Weller posted
1241385973.4028.67.ca...@localhost.localdomain, excerpted below, on Sun,
03 May 2009 22:26:13 +0100:
> On a more serious note, the problem seems to be the complete lack of
> management in the required places, Gentoo is fast becoming (or more
> likely, already is) an a
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-05-03 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-tex/breqn 2009-04-27 06:06:17 ulm
net-misc/kphone 2009-04-28 16:00:30 volkmar
net-im/ekiga
36 matches
Mail list logo
