Re: [gentoo-dev] PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready

2009-04-20 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On P, 2009-04-12 at 20:59 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > I've got the EAPI 3 branch for PMS more or less ready: > > http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 > > The provisional included feature list is everything that was ready > before the deadline. > > Before the next Council meeting (id

Re: [gentoo-dev] PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready

2009-04-20 Thread Petteri Räty
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > I've got the EAPI 3 branch for PMS more or less ready: > > http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 > > The provisional included feature list is everything that was ready > before the deadline. > > Before the next Council meeting (ideally a week before, so we've got

Re: [gentoo-dev] PROFILE-IUSE-INJECTION implicit things (Was: PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready)

2009-04-20 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 20.04.2009, 13:41 +0100 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > Let's see if we can keep to one thread per item here. > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:14:00 +0200 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > * PROFILE-IUSE-INJECTION > > yes, but *_IMPLICIT has to be discussed. > > There are a few suggested use cas

Re: [gentoo-dev] PROFILE-IUSE-INJECTION implicit things (Was: PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready)

2009-04-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
Let's see if we can keep to one thread per item here. On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:14:00 +0200 Tiziano Müller wrote: > > * PROFILE-IUSE-INJECTION > yes, but *_IMPLICIT has to be discussed. There are a few suggested use cases for these: * Avoiding the need for developers to have to explicitly list ARC

Re: [gentoo-dev] PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready

2009-04-20 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: >> * CONTROLLABLE-COMPRESS > no. Without this we cannot get rid of the "prepalldocs" calls in the tree. Ulrich