On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 06:27:40PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hi Arches,
>
> I started to move some files matching *2005* in experimental/ where they
> were obviously obsoleted by something else, however I'd like I hand in
> files that are no longer needed on the mirrors.
>
> Please reply t
Hi Arches,
I started to move some files matching *2005* in experimental/ where they
were obviously obsoleted by something else, however I'd like I hand in
files that are no longer needed on the mirrors.
Please reply to this post with a list of the filenames under
experimental/
--
Robin Hugh Joh
On Saturday 11 April 2009 12:42:23 Mike Pagano wrote:
> The kernel team is tentatively planning to request that
> gentoo-sources-2.6.28 gets marked stable on x86+amd64 on May 3rd, assuming
> we have fixed all regressions (we have some open, which will hopefully be
> fixed soon).
>
We've decided to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:15:46 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" wrote:
> and from #gentoo-council:
> [do apr 9 2009] [22:41:47] those of you with a pet
> feature, feel free to respond to the summary on -dev if you have some
> compelling reason why it's
Hi,
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" :
> I know I personally asked for mtime preservation on 7-5-2008 on this
> list[1] and the issue has surely existed even longer. Let's get rid
> of this problem already.
The whole GNU Emacs team and the rest of the Lisp project is behind
you here.
--
Christian Fa
Hi,
Christian Faulhammer :
> with EAPI 3 confusion about what is in which EAPI may increase,
> although appendix E of the PMS is quite helpful here. Anyway,
> something handy to put on your desk is my little EAPI leaflet which
> gives you all important (in my eyes) information in one leaf. Have
