> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
>> what would people think of "newins" (and the other "new*" commands)
>> accepting "-" as the first argument?
> I like it :-)
Bug 263565 now.
Ulrich
Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 23:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Alfredsen:
> Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd
> send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs.
> This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug
> and where
Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 23:08 +0100, Peter Alfredsen a écrit :
> Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd
> send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs.
> This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug
> and where
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 00:08:53 Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd
> send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs.
> This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug
> and where genste
Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd
send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs.
This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug
and where genstef is the maintainer.
media-video/linux-uvc
media-video/isight-fi
Dne neděle 22 Březen 2009 17:50:26 Alin Năstac napsal(a):
> Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
> versions than ${PV}.
> Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
>
> Cheers,
> Alin
Hi,
I was working on patches glep [1] (nothing final and it is highly in p
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:51:28 +0100
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 23-03-2009 11:41:08 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > People split into three groups:
> >
> > - Friends of ${P}-fix-issue.patch naming
> > - Friends of ${PN}-fix-issue.patch naming
> > - Friends of ${PN}-1.2.3-fix-issue.p
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 12:28 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> dev-ruby/coderay
> dev-ruby/exifr
> dev-ruby/png
The ruby herd will take these.
Kind regards,
Hans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>>> Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
>>> "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first
>>> argument?
>
>> There's a slightly different
* "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" :
> Torsten Veller wrote:
> > # Masked for removal (#151986,#171649,#239222) (23 Mar 2009)
> > # 151986 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 installs stuff in /lib instead of /usr/lib
> > # 171649 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 fails to build with ghc-6.6
> > # 239222 - Remove dependencies in
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:11 +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2009 09:22:06 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >
> >newins - baz <<<$'# a short\n# file'
>
> Why can't you use "newins /dev/stdin foo" that it works out of the box?
Nope, /dev/stdin isn't portable.
While Linux and Solari
On Monday 23 March 2009 09:22:06 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
> "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first
> argument? I don't know how many usage cases there are, but the
> following are obvious:
>
>sed 's/q
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
>> "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first
>> argument?
> There's a slightly different variation in exheres-0: as well as do*
> and new*, there's als
On Mo, 2009-03-23 at 11:26 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> [...]
> Ali Polatel (hawking)
> [...]
> net-irc/bip
Shamelessly stole that one.
Gracias,
Alex
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:53:23 -0400
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> of course this leads to the problem... what if the 'admin' explicitly
> changed the permissions... Maybe we should have something like
> PERMS_PROTECT (similar to config_protect). where portage won't update
> the permissions if file/directo
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:22:06 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
> "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first
> argument?
There's a slightly different variation in exheres-0: as well as do* and
new*, there's als
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Following this month processing of the retirement batch, the following
packages had their metadata.xml updated to remove all maintainers that
were retired.
If you are a maintainer or a member of a herd listed in these packages,
you may want to rev
Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 11:26 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto a
écrit :
> dev-libs/gdl
> gnome-extra/gsynaptics
will be taken by gnome.
* gdl will die soonish because it's been integrated in anjuta
proper iirc.
* gsynaptics will die soonish anyway due to xorg-server 1.6 and
2009/3/24 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto :
> Hi.
>
> Following this month processing of the retirement batch, the following
> packages have been reassigned to maintainer-needed and can take some
> love. You know the drill, so if you want to maintain any of them please
> add yourself to the metadata.xm
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:26:06 -0100
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote:
[...]
> Saleem Abdulrasool (compnerd)
[...]
> dev-dotnet/dbus-glib-sharp
> dev-dotnet/dbus-sharp
[...]
Snatched
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Following this month processing of the retirement batch, the following
packages have been reassigned to maintainer-needed and can take some
love. You know the drill, so if you want to maintain any of them please
add yourself to the metadata.xml.
On Monday 23 March 2009 12:45:55 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Some repositories has the git (or svn) and http support. I saw that we
> > choose the git/svn one (it's faster i know, but it does not works under
> > proxy).
> >
> > I p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Torsten Veller wrote:
> # Masked for removal (#151986,#171649,#239222) (23 Mar 2009)
> # 151986 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 installs stuff in /lib instead of /usr/lib
> # 171649 - dev-lang/pugs-6.2.13 fails to build with ghc-6.6
> # 239222 - Remove dependen
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> Hi,
> Some repositories has the git (or svn) and http support. I saw that we choose
> the git/svn one (it's faster i know, but it does not works under proxy).
>
> I propose a E{GIT,SVN}_REPO_HTTP_URI (or similar) variable that uses the htt
Serkan Kaba said:
> Thilo Bangert yazmış:
> > i doesnt make sense to introduce EAPI=2 into ebuilds, if we dont
> > expect to have en EAPI=2 capable package manager stable within a
> > reasonable timeframe.
>
> 2.1.6 is stable and supports EAPI2
thats pretty cool. thanks...
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
I wouldn't call it banned, rather "useless" since everyone directly
uses sed instead.
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS?
DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1].
Some eclasses already do this (not base, but others), and if that
default doesn't cover it for you, the function can be overridden.
Concerning the argument of declarative
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> I think what's missing is the following observation:
>
> ${PN}-fix-issue.patch naming is bad if you patch code that is (likely)
> to change in newer releases. This is almost always the case. Ultimate
> example, patch something in ffmpeg or mplayer, and the next snapshot
>
On 23-03-2009 11:41:08 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> People split into three groups:
>
> - Friends of ${P}-fix-issue.patch naming
> - Friends of ${PN}-fix-issue.patch naming
> - Friends of ${PN}-1.2.3-fix-issue.patch naming
>
> Qualities
[snip]
I think what's missing is the foll
Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> Hi,
> Some repositories has the git (or svn) and http support. I saw that we choose
> the git/svn one (it's faster i know, but it does not works under proxy).
>
> I propose a E{GIT,SVN}_REPO_HTTP_URI (or similar) variable that uses the http
Good idea.
> variant when
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Alin Năstac wrote:
>
>> I suppose what everyone does in their part of the tree is their
>> business, but a small subset of packages I maintain have other
>> maintainers as well. It is annoying to see rules you assume being
>> respected on your ebuilds being broken at every bump
Hi,
Some repositories has the git (or svn) and http support. I saw that we choose
the git/svn one (it's faster i know, but it does not works under proxy).
I propose a E{GIT,SVN}_REPO_HTTP_URI (or similar) variable that uses the http
variant when the global use is set (or we can use the http_prox
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:04:32 +0100
Alin Năstac wrote:
> I suppose what everyone does in their part of the tree is their
> business, but a small subset of packages I maintain have other
> maintainers as well. It is annoying to see rules you assume being
> respected on your ebuilds being broken at
Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 09:22 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller:
> Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
> "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first
> argument? I don't know how many usage cases there are, but the
> following are obvious:
>
>
Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
"newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first
argument? I don't know how many usage cases there are, but the
following are obvious:
sed 's/quux/quuux/' foo | newins - foo
It would allow for here documents:
Am Sonntag, den 22.03.2009, 20:38 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:18:52 +0100
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
> > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
> > list to see.
>
>
On 3/23/09 1:44 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Alin Năstac wrote:
>
>> Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version
>> you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version
>> (foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me).
>>
>
> What exactly is your problem that you are t
On 3/23/09 1:42 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:19:26 +0100
> Alin Năstac wrote:
>
>
>> Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version
>> you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version
>> (foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me).
>>
>
>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:55:48 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:55:38 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > These herds have no members:
>
> > ... <
>
> > live-cd:
> > app-admin/pwgen
> > app-arch/pbzip2
> > app-misc/livecd-tools
> > dev-python/pyparted
> > dev-util/catalyst
> > me
39 matches
Mail list logo
