[gentoo-dev] Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )

2009-03-03 Thread Caleb Cushing
I'd like to start with, I'm not trying to stir up trouble but since questions were asked i'll answer them. > If you think neither should exist why do you have an opinion about this at > all? I merged the java-overlay into regen2 a couple of weeks ago. as of right now I've no plans to support jav

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 21:24 Tue 03 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 03 March 2009 21:01:36 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Please share your thoughts and ideas as a reply here > > there have been threads in the past about collecting all the random scripts > that people use related to Gentoo. you might want to

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 03:26 Wed 04 Mar , Peter Alfredsen wrote: > On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:01:36 +0200 > Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > I'm collecting ideas from the wider development and contributing > > community on how to help maintainers and contributors get work done > > quicker, or rephrased - how to get more d

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Josh Saddler
Olivier Crête wrote: > Maybe we could use the dev wiki for that kind of stuff? > > Having a wiki.gentoo.org would be even better... There is, but it's uber-sekrit. Or so I was told some years ago. It may or may not (still) exist. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Olivier Crête
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:26 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote: > On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:01:36 +0200 > Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > I'm collecting ideas from the wider development and contributing > > community on how to help maintainers and contributors get work done > > quicker, or rephrased - how to g

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:01:36 +0200 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I'm collecting ideas from the wider development and contributing > community on how to help maintainers and contributors get work done > quicker, or rephrased - how to get more done in the limited time we > have. Something like what Debia

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 21:01:36 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Please share your thoughts and ideas as a reply here there have been threads in the past about collecting all the random scripts that people use related to Gentoo. you might want to scrape those as well as the cvs dir that was set up to h

[gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Hello, I'm collecting ideas from the wider development and contributing community on how to help maintainers and contributors get work done quicker, or rephrased - how to get more done in the limited time we have. This basically means ideas for tools, scripts, or functionality in some hypothetica

Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-4.0-r1 for ~arch

2009-03-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 02 March 2009 22:56:27 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 19:27 Mon 02 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > unless i see any new issues come up, bash-4.0-r1 will be going into ~arch > > this week. now would be a good time to sync up and try bash-4.0 on your > > system :p. -mike > > comet $ sourc

Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-4.0-r1 for ~arch

2009-03-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 02:56:21 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 23:54 Mon 02 Mar , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 01:27 Tue 03 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Monday 02 March 2009 22:56:27 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > > Actually seems like quite a few of the bash-completion scripts have >

[gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, I am currently messing with git.eclass and i would like to see some other sets of eyes on it. I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. I will be really happy for comments and even more for diffs :D [1] http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/scarabeus.git;a=blob;f=eclass/g

[gentoo-dev] gems.eclass review

2009-03-03 Thread Alex Legler
Hey, we have some changes to be made in gems.eclass for Ruby 1.9.1. Basically this introduces the possibility to install gems for multiple versions of Ruby. If anyone feels like reviewing, please review the following changes: ;) http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.txt Diff against the c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 2

2009-03-03 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 12:13:34 Peter Volkov wrote: > > > > Could you just use dosed here? > > > > dosed needs to die. > > Why? Because it's utterly pointless and exists only for legacy reasons. Few packages use it anyway. -- Bo Andresen

[gentoo-dev] March KDE Team meeting.

2009-03-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, as usual there is again one month gone so we are going to have meeting. This time it will be on Thursday 5.3. at 19:00 UTC in #gentoo-kde. We have on our TODO for this meeting: - kde3 eapi2 and other kde3 stuff that needs to be done. - kde4.2 things we have to do for its stabilisation. - cmake

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Overlay Layout support.

2009-03-03 Thread Petteri Räty
Caleb Cushing wrote: >> Are we to say that we shouldn't allow tools to have support for this. I >> think that it is a nature progression that if we are to allow overlays to >> extend the portage tree that we should allow overlays to extend other >> overlays. > > I probably shouldn't butt in... >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 2

2009-03-03 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 02/03/2009 в 13:01 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen пишет: > On Monday 02 March 2009 08:24:35 Torsten Veller wrote: > > > Could you just use dosed here? > > dosed needs to die. Why? -- Peter. signature.asc Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Overlay Layout support.

2009-03-03 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Caleb Cushing wrote: >> Are we to say that we shouldn't allow tools to have support for this. I >> think that it is a nature progression that if we are to allow overlays to >> extend the portage tree that we should allow overlays to extend other >> o

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI stored in metadata.xml (was: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives)

2009-03-03 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, sorry, if this post doubles some other posts already done by others...I wrote it during a journey and haven't catched yet with the discussion. Kumba : > Kumba wrote: > > > > I was talking to Alec last night in -dev (yes, I'm still alive), > > and I tossed out the idea of using metadata.xml

Re: [gentoo-dev] Using -frecord-gcc-switches

2009-03-03 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 03/03/2009 07:33, Donnie Berkholz a écrit : Thoughts? Could we do something useful with this? What about the various objects that make up the final lib/binary? How is this handled? Looks like a promising idea though Cheers, Rémi