Hi!
(fixed the subject)
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> [Mike: This looks like your field of expertise]
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:47:50 +0100
> Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>
> > glibc 2.9 uses a different way to implement getaddrinfo() which
> > triggers a race condition in most (if n
Man Shankar wrote:
> On 23:51 Mon 26 Jan , Alec Warner wrote:
> [snipped]
>
>
>> A long time ago I suggested some sort of pr-onduty role where
>> basically for a set period you are the prime pr contact and if someone
>> has news it is your job to review and post it or reject it.
[Mike: This looks like your field of expertise]
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:47:50 +0100
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> glibc 2.9 uses a different way to implement getaddrinfo() which
> triggers a race condition in most (if not all) Netfilter
> firewalls that use connection tracking. glibc does no
Hi,
glibc 2.9 uses a different way to implement getaddrinfo() which
triggers a race condition in most (if not all) Netfilter
firewalls that use connection tracking. glibc does nothing wrong
per se, it just triggers the condition. (technical details here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=1233044
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:34:49 -0800
Alec Warner wrote:
> You seriously see no benefits to EAPI 1 or 2 in profiles? What about
> slot deps? use deps? these things have been core feature requests
> since 2003; surely you don't think they are useless to our users?
Use deps in profiles don't make sen
Alec Warner wrote:
> > Why do you not tend to commit news or approve things?
>
> PR@ is a nghtmare of spam and what I'll term 'crap.' having real
> things marked as such with informative subjects would be useful.
> having some kind of rotation would be useful
> having some kind of vague 'we will
On 23:51 Mon 26 Jan , Alec Warner wrote:
[snipped]
> A long time ago I suggested some sort of pr-onduty role where
> basically for a set period you are the prime pr contact and if someone
> has news it is your job to review and post it or reject it. This was
> never implemented; bu
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:17 AM, AllenJB wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:30 PM, AllenJB
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The Gentoo PR Project currently appears to be having difficulties with
>>> keeping up, both with the newsletters and announcements, and I believe
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 21:30 Mon 26 Jan , AllenJB wrote:
The Gentoo PR Project currently appears to be having difficulties with
keeping up, both with the newsletters and announcements, and I believe
this is currently reflecting badly on the project as a whole.
It's easy to complain and
Alec Warner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:30 PM, AllenJB wrote:
Hi all,
The Gentoo PR Project currently appears to be having difficulties with
keeping up, both with the newsletters and announcements, and I believe this
is currently reflecting badly on the project as a whole. These issues ar
10 matches
Mail list logo
