Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also relevant question: some tests require root privileges. What we
>> should do in such case?
>
> When I asked this previously I was told to check the current user's
> permissions before running them. I haven't had a case where I've had
> to though.
On l
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:52:25 +0300
Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В Вск, 16/11/2008 в 15:33 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
> >
> > > - FEATURES=test failures;
> >
>
> And what we are supposed to do if upstream states that tests
I do not know about Eclipse that much but from my point of view there is
a big difference between Eclipse and Netbeans. Eclipse is an IDE where
you have to install plugins after installation of Eclipse to make
yourself productive, whereas Netbeans provides complete working IDE in
single package (wi
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:03:12 +0100
"Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to add NETBEANS to USE_EXPAND. Netbeans (www.netbeans.org) is
> modular IDE with 18 modules (clusters). Users can freely choose what
> support thay want to build in netbeans, though some modules nee
Just a note to my email, maybe it would be better to use
NETBEANS_MODULES instead of NETBEANS as NETBEANS_MODULES is more
accurate. NETBEANS_MODULES was even suggested by Betelgeuse in the
mentioned bug.
Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
Gentoo Java Team
Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> I'd
Hi,
I'd like to add NETBEANS to USE_EXPAND. Netbeans (www.netbeans.org) is
modular IDE with 18 modules (clusters). Users can freely choose what
support thay want to build in netbeans, though some modules need other
modules to compile and work. Are there any objections?
Here are the modules/cluste
On 11/17/08, Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В Вск, 16/11/2008 в 15:33 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
> >
> > > - FEATURES=test failures;
> >
>
> And what we are supposed to do if upstream states that tests are not
> supposed
On 11/19/08, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you *use* or *want* to keep this mode of repoman; please comment on
> the bug[1].
>
> If you do *not* use or do *not* want to keep this mode of repoman, do
> nothing.
>
> This is an informal means to see if anyone is using repoman full or
If you *use* or *want* to keep this mode of repoman; please comment on
the bug[1].
If you do *not* use or do *not* want to keep this mode of repoman, do nothing.
This is an informal means to see if anyone is using repoman full or
repoman lfull; if it turns out not I hope to cut a patch to remove
