Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 22 Oct
2008 17:28:53 +0200:
> no support in stable profile out-of-the-box -> no stable keyword ->
> INVALID request. No compromise.
Well, at least the one referenced bug (243050) is for an ~arch keyword,
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> This is your friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & 4th
> Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
> irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
> on, let us know! Simply repl
Hi,
no support in stable profile out-of-the-box -> no stable keyword ->
INVALID request. No compromise.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://www.faulhammer.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>
>>> While the rule of thumb has been if an eclass needs something it should
>>> provide it's own depends. However the virtualx eclass needs to be
>>> different simply because in some cases it's only uses for tests (this is
Steve Long wrote:
>
> Can you tell me what a 'server' USE flag _breaks_?
>
Global use flags must behave the same way in all ebuilds where they are
used. The server use flag currently doesn't.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/47164
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Descripti
On Wednesday 22 of October 2008 11:54:39 Alistair Bush wrote:
> Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> > Hello fellow developers and users.
> >
> > I'd like to know your opinion of bug #243050 [1]
> >
> > 01:18:59 cla @| If user bothers to patch his kernel, he can
> > bother to add proper package.keywo
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> Hello fellow developers and users.
>
> I'd like to know your opinion of bug #243050 [1]
>
> 01:18:59 cla @| If user bothers to patch his kernel, he can bother
> to add proper package.keyword line, imo.
++
> 01:21:52 hparker @| Or maybe get the patches
