Hello fellow developers and users.
I'd like to know your opinion of bug #243050 [1]
01:18:02 Chainsaw @| cla: I think I don't have the hardware to test it.
01:18:32 cla @| I have it, my question is if we should keyword
packages, that are supposed to run on patched kernels.
01:18:5
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 15:40 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Втр, 01/07/2008 в 05:05 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет:
> > Over a year or two ago, it was communicated that it supposedly a policy
> > that USE=static
>
> Well, I don't have web-reference at hand now, but there was a thread in
> gentoo-dev wi
On 21-10-2008 16:09:12 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > As "Gentoo Solaris" would not be the same as "Gentoo Prefix on Solaris",
> > it should not share the *-solaris keywords used for Prefix via the same
> > KEYWORDS-setting.
> what about a new generic schema like: CPU-OS[-prefix] with the possibi
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 20:11 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
>> sparc-solaris
>> sparc64-solaris
>> x64-solaris
>> x86-solaris
>
>> Perhaps using KEYWORDS for Prefix keywords is not the best thing to do,
>> and should we use something like PREFIX_KEYWORDS?
>
> Ma
